Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

The KFIoU Loss for Rotated Object Detection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2201.12558 v6 pith:QNPJVSPY submitted 2022-01-29 cs.CV cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.LG
keywords lossskewioudetectorsgaussiandetectiondistanceadoptedcenter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Differing from the well-developed horizontal object detection area whereby the computing-friendly IoU based loss is readily adopted and well fits with the detection metrics. In contrast, rotation detectors often involve a more complicated loss based on SkewIoU which is unfriendly to gradient-based training. In this paper, we propose an effective approximate SkewIoU loss based on Gaussian modeling and Gaussian product, which mainly consists of two items. The first term is a scale-insensitive center point loss, which is used to quickly narrow the distance between the center points of the two bounding boxes. In the distance-independent second term, the product of the Gaussian distributions is adopted to inherently mimic the mechanism of SkewIoU by its definition, and show its alignment with the SkewIoU loss at trend-level within a certain distance (i.e. within 9 pixels). This is in contrast to recent Gaussian modeling based rotation detectors e.g. GWD loss and KLD loss that involve a human-specified distribution distance metric which require additional hyperparameter tuning that vary across datasets and detectors. The resulting new loss called KFIoU loss is easier to implement and works better compared with exact SkewIoU loss, thanks to its full differentiability and ability to handle the non-overlapping cases. We further extend our technique to the 3-D case which also suffers from the same issues as 2-D. Extensive results on various public datasets (2-D/3-D, aerial/text/face images) with different base detectors show the effectiveness of our approach.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Geometry Meets Semantics: Fractional Gradient Stabilization for Semantic-Driven Bounding Box Optimization in Visual Detection Tasks

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.5 of 10

    FrSIoU couples semantic feature similarity with IoU and modulates the loss by a fractional history of sIoU to stabilize oriented-box angle gradients, with modest gains on DOTA, HRSC2016, and SSDD.

  2. MHAF-YOLO: Multi-Branch Heterogeneous Auxiliary Fusion YOLO for accurate object detection

    cs.CV 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    MHAF-YOLO reaches 48.9% AP on COCO with 7.1M parameters by combining auxiliary shallow-deep fusion paths and heterogeneous reparameterized convolutions.

Pith tools