Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Towards a Guideline for Evaluation Metrics in Medical Image Segmentation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2202.05273 v1 pith:6WCB253Q submitted 2022-02-10 eess.IV cs.CVcs.LG

classification eess.IVcs.CVcs.LG
keywords evaluationimagesegmentationmedicalstudiesfieldguidelinemetrics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In the last decade, research on artificial intelligence has seen rapid growth with deep learning models, especially in the field of medical image segmentation. Various studies demonstrated that these models have powerful prediction capabilities and achieved similar results as clinicians. However, recent studies revealed that the evaluation in image segmentation studies lacks reliable model performance assessment and showed statistical bias by incorrect metric implementation or usage. Thus, this work provides an overview and interpretation guide on the following metrics for medical image segmentation evaluation in binary as well as multi-class problems: Dice similarity coefficient, Jaccard, Sensitivity, Specificity, Rand index, ROC curves, Cohen's Kappa, and Hausdorff distance. As a summary, we propose a guideline for standardized medical image segmentation evaluation to improve evaluation quality, reproducibility, and comparability in the research field.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Can Diffusion Models Bridge the Domain Gap in Cardiac MR Imaging?

    cs.CV 2025-08 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A source-domain diffusion model with reference-guided sampling is applied to cardiac MRI domain shift, with mixed evidence: surface metrics improve on synthetic test data but the domain-generalisation claim is contrad...

  2. Faithful, Interpretable Chest X-ray Diagnosis with Anti-Aliased B-cos Networks

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Combining B-cos networks with anti-aliasing pooling (FLC or BlurPool) reduces grid artifacts in chest X-ray explanation maps while keeping diagnostic accuracy close to baseline networks.

Pith tools