REVIEW 2 cited by
Gamma-ray halos around pulsars as the key to understanding cosmic ray transport in the Galaxy
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Pulsars are factories of relativistic electrons and positrons that propagate away from the pulsar, permeating later our Galaxy. The acceleration and propagation of these particles are a matter of intense debate. In the last few years, we had the opportunity to directly observing the injection of these particles into the interstellar medium through the discovery of gamma-ray halos around pulsars. This new type of gamma-ray source is produced by electrons and positrons diffusing out of the pulsar wind nebula and scattering ambient photon fields to produce gamma rays. This new field of study comes with a number of observations and constraints at different wavelengths and a variety of theoretical models explaining the characteristics of these halos. We examine the characteristics of the propagation of cosmic rays inferred from the observations of halos and their local and global implications on particle transport in the Galaxy. We also discuss the prospects for observations of these sources with facilities such as LHAASO, or CTA or SWGO in the near future.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Absence of TeV halos around millisecond pulsars
A stacking analysis of 57 millisecond pulsars in HAWC data finds no TeV halo emission, setting upper limits below the inferred efficiency of known TeV halos.
-
Extended TeV Halos May Commonly Exist around Middle-Aged Pulsars
A stacking analysis of HAWC data yields 5.1 sigma evidence that extended TeV halos commonly surround middle-aged pulsars, not just a few famous ones.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.