Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Safe Control with Learned Certificates: A Survey of Neural Lyapunov, Barrier, and Contraction methods

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2202.11762 v2 pith:PMLTTDA4 submitted 2022-02-23 cs.RO cs.SYeess.SY

classification cs.ROcs.SYeess.SY
keywords controllearnedlearningsafetycertificatesstabilitycertificateguarantees
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Learning-enabled control systems have demonstrated impressive empirical performance on challenging control problems in robotics, but this performance comes at the cost of reduced transparency and lack of guarantees on the safety or stability of the learned controllers. In recent years, new techniques have emerged to provide these guarantees by learning certificates alongside control policies -- these certificates provide concise, data-driven proofs that guarantee the safety and stability of the learned control system. These methods not only allow the user to verify the safety of a learned controller but also provide supervision during training, allowing safety and stability requirements to influence the training process itself. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive survey of this rapidly developing field of certificate learning. We hope that this paper will serve as an accessible introduction to the theory and practice of certificate learning, both to those who wish to apply these tools to practical robotics problems and to those who wish to dive more deeply into the theory of learning for control.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Learning Verifiable Control Policies Using Relaxed Verification

    eess.SY 2025-04 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A loss function built from differentiable reachable-set bounds lets neural control policies be trained to satisfy reach-avoid and invariance specifications, so a lightweight verifier can re-check them at run time.

  2. Neural Port-Hamiltonian Models for Nonlinear Distributed Control: An Unconstrained Parametrization Approach

    eess.SY 2024-11 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A pH-structured neural controller is proven to have a finite L2 gain for all parameters, but the claimed finite incremental L2 gain is not proven and fails in simple cases.

  3. Steering Robots with Inference-Time Interactions

    cs.RO 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Frozen imitation policies can be steered at inference time via user interactions, with a diffusion-sampling method and a constraint-enforcing framework that provides formal task guarantees.

Pith tools