Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Detection of Word Adversarial Examples in Text Classification: Benchmark and Baseline via Robust Density Estimation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2203.01677 v1 pith:A6BVK6YC submitted 2022-03-03 cs.CL cs.CRcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.CRcs.LG
keywords adversarialexamplesfourmodelsbaselinebeendefensedensity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Word-level adversarial attacks have shown success in NLP models, drastically decreasing the performance of transformer-based models in recent years. As a countermeasure, adversarial defense has been explored, but relatively few efforts have been made to detect adversarial examples. However, detecting adversarial examples may be crucial for automated tasks (e.g. review sentiment analysis) that wish to amass information about a certain population and additionally be a step towards a robust defense system. To this end, we release a dataset for four popular attack methods on four datasets and four models to encourage further research in this field. Along with it, we propose a competitive baseline based on density estimation that has the highest AUC on 29 out of 30 dataset-attack-model combinations. Source code is available in https://github.com/anoymous92874838/text-adv-detection.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Stitch in Time Saves Nine: Small VLM is a Precise Guidance for Accelerating Large VLMs

    cs.CV 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A small VLM's aggregated attention map can guide aggressive visual token pruning in a much larger VLM, preserving accuracy at 9% token retention and enabling early exit.

Pith tools