REVIEW 2 cited by
On Decoding Strategies for Neural Text Generators
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
When generating text from probabilistic models, the chosen decoding strategy has a profound effect on the resulting text. Yet the properties elicited by various decoding strategies do not always transfer across natural language generation tasks. For example, while mode-seeking methods like beam search perform remarkably well for machine translation, they have been observed to lead to incoherent and repetitive text in story generation. Despite such observations, the effectiveness of decoding strategies is often assessed with respect to only a single task. This work -- in contrast -- provides a comprehensive analysis of the interaction between language generation tasks and decoding strategies. Specifically, we measure changes in attributes of generated text as a function of both decoding strategy and task using human and automatic evaluation. Our results reveal both previously-observed and surprising findings. For example, the nature of the diversity-quality trade-off in language generation is very task-specific; the length bias often attributed to beam search is not constant across tasks.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Multi-Hypothesis Distillation of Multilingual Neural Translation Models for Low-Resource Languages
Generating several candidate translations per source sentence for knowledge distillation yields better small multilingual translators than standard single-hypothesis distillation, especially in low-resource settings.
-
Advancing Decoding Strategies: Enhancements in Locally Typical Sampling for LLMs
ASTS extends locally typical sampling with semantic scoring and dynamic thresholds, reporting improved perplexity, MAUVE, and diversity on story and summarization tasks.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.