REVIEW 1 cited by
Constraining the Milky Way's Pulsar Population with the Cosmic-Ray Positron Fraction
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Observations of the TeV halos associated with nearby pulsars indicate that these objects inject significant fluxes of very high-energy electron-positrons pairs into the interstellar medium (ISM), thereby likely providing the dominant contribution to the cosmic-ray positron flux. In this paper, we use the cosmic-ray positron fraction as measured by the AMS-02 Collaboration to constrain the characteristics of the local pulsar population. For reasonable model parameters, we find that we can obtain good agreement with the measured positron fraction up to energies of $E_e \sim 300 \, {\rm GeV}$. At higher energies, the positron fraction is dominated by a small number of pulsars, making it difficult to reliably predict the shape of the expected positron fraction. The low-energy positron spectrum supports the conclusion that pulsars typically transfer approximately $\eta \sim 5-20\%$ of their total spindown power into the production of very high-energy electron-positron pairs, producing a spectrum of such particles with a hard spectral index, $\alpha \sim 1.5-1.7$. Such pulsars typically spindown on a timescale on the order of $\tau \sim 10^4 \, {\rm years}$. Our best fits were obtained for models in which the radio and gamma-ray beams from pulsars are detectable to 28% and 62% of surrounding observers, respectively.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Astrophysical origins of TeV features in the cosmic-ray lepton spectrum
Pulsar and supernova-remnant models yield TeV electron features with effective sharpness beta_eff of roughly 2 to 3.6, so a sharper, stable edge would favor exotic origins.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.