REVIEW 3 cited by
Self-supervised Learning in Remote Sensing: A Review
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
In deep learning research, self-supervised learning (SSL) has received great attention triggering interest within both the computer vision and remote sensing communities. While there has been a big success in computer vision, most of the potential of SSL in the domain of earth observation remains locked. In this paper, we provide an introduction to, and a review of the concepts and latest developments in SSL for computer vision in the context of remote sensing. Further, we provide a preliminary benchmark of modern SSL algorithms on popular remote sensing datasets, verifying the potential of SSL in remote sensing and providing an extended study on data augmentations. Finally, we identify a list of promising directions of future research in SSL for earth observation (SSL4EO) to pave the way for fruitful interaction of both domains.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Very High-Resolution Forest Mapping with TanDEM-X InSAR Data and Self-Supervised Learning
Masked inpainting pre-training on unlabeled TanDEM-X InSAR data improves limited-label 6 m forest mapping, lifting Amazon overall accuracy from 0.65 to 0.74 versus fully supervised training.
-
PANGAEA: A Global and Inclusive Benchmark for Geospatial Foundation Models
PANGAEA provides a standardized multi-task, multi-sensor, and multi-temporal benchmark for geospatial foundation models, and shows that they do not consistently outperform supervised baselines.
-
Self-Supervised Learning for Image Segmentation: A Comprehensive Survey
A survey categorizing self-supervised pretraining methods for image segmentation into predictive, generative, and contrastive approaches, with a list of benchmark datasets.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.