Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Human-AI Collaboration in Decision-Making: Beyond Learning to Defer

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2206.13202 v2 pith:OANW5NRW submitted 2022-06-27 cs.LG cs.AIcs.HC

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.HC
keywords haichumanscollaborationdecision-makingdeferhuman-ailearningsystems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Human-AI collaboration (HAIC) in decision-making aims to create synergistic teaming between human decision-makers and AI systems. Learning to defer (L2D) has been presented as a promising framework to determine who among humans and AI should make which decisions in order to optimize the performance and fairness of the combined system. Nevertheless, L2D entails several often unfeasible requirements, such as the availability of predictions from humans for every instance or ground-truth labels that are independent from said humans. Furthermore, neither L2D nor alternative approaches tackle fundamental issues of deploying HAIC systems in real-world settings, such as capacity management or dealing with dynamic environments. In this paper, we aim to identify and review these and other limitations, pointing to where opportunities for future research in HAIC may lie.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 20 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Bridging Expertise Gaps: The Role of LLMs in Human-AI Collaboration for Cybersecurity

    cs.CR 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    In n=58 non-expert participants, human-AI collaboration improved phishing precision and intrusion recall, with confident LLM responses strongly influencing user decisions.

Pith tools