REVIEW 1 cited by
Back to the Basics: Revisiting Out-of-Distribution Detection Baselines
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We study simple methods for out-of-distribution (OOD) image detection that are compatible with any already trained classifier, relying on only its predictions or learned representations. Evaluating the OOD detection performance of various methods when utilized with ResNet-50 and Swin Transformer models, we find methods that solely consider the model's predictions can be easily outperformed by also considering the learned representations. Based on our analysis, we advocate for a dead-simple approach that has been neglected in other studies: simply flag as OOD images whose average distance to their K nearest neighbors is large (in the representation space of an image classifier trained on the in-distribution data).
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
ConceptVAE: Self-Supervised Fine-Grained Concept Disentanglement from 2D Echocardiographies
ConceptVAE learns to discretize echocardiograms into fine-grained anatomical concepts and per-concept styles without labels, and reports gains over a VICReg baseline on retrieval, segmentation, and OOD detection.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.