REVIEW 1 cited by
An Empirical Evaluation of Four Off-the-Shelf Proprietary Visual-Inertial Odometry Systems
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Commercial visual-inertial odometry (VIO) systems have been gaining attention as cost-effective, off-the-shelf six degrees of freedom (6-DoF) ego-motion tracking methods for estimating accurate and consistent camera pose data, in addition to their ability to operate without external localization from motion capture or global positioning systems. It is unclear from existing results, however, which commercial VIO platforms are the most stable, consistent, and accurate in terms of state estimation for indoor and outdoor robotic applications. We assess four popular proprietary VIO systems (Apple ARKit, Google ARCore, Intel RealSense T265, and Stereolabs ZED 2) through a series of both indoor and outdoor experiments where we show their positioning stability, consistency, and accuracy. We present our complete results as a benchmark comparison for the research community.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
GLidE-SLAM: GL-Accelerated Indirect-Direct Embedded SLAM
GLidE-SLAM moves pose-only photometric tracking to OpenGL ES compute shaders, reporting up to 9x faster frame rates than ORB-SLAM2 on embedded platforms with comparable ATE on TUM and EuRoC sequences.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.