REVIEW 2 cited by
A Hazard Analysis Framework for Code Synthesis Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Codex, a large language model (LLM) trained on a variety of codebases, exceeds the previous state of the art in its capacity to synthesize and generate code. Although Codex provides a plethora of benefits, models that may generate code on such scale have significant limitations, alignment problems, the potential to be misused, and the possibility to increase the rate of progress in technical fields that may themselves have destabilizing impacts or have misuse potential. Yet such safety impacts are not yet known or remain to be explored. In this paper, we outline a hazard analysis framework constructed at OpenAI to uncover hazards or safety risks that the deployment of models like Codex may impose technically, socially, politically, and economically. The analysis is informed by a novel evaluation framework that determines the capacity of advanced code generation techniques against the complexity and expressivity of specification prompts, and their capability to understand and execute them relative to human ability.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
ExploreGS: Explorable 3D Scene Reconstruction with Virtual Camera Samplings and Diffusion Priors
Adding information-gain-selected virtual views refined by video diffusion priors to 3D Gaussian Splatting improves arbitrary-view rendering quality.
-
From Hazard Identification to Controller Design: Proactive and LLM-Supported Safety Engineering for ML-Powered Systems
An LLM-assisted STPA walkthrough of a trail-recommendation app shows how everyday ML systems can proactively surface and mitigate a broad range of harms.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.