Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Demystifying Arch-hints for Model Extraction: An Attack in Unified Memory System

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2208.13720 v1 pith:3PNSK3MM submitted 2022-08-29 cs.CR cs.DC

classification cs.CRcs.DC
keywords modelarch-hintsattackextractionsystemumprobebenchmarkdata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The deep neural network (DNN) models are deemed confidential due to their unique value in expensive training efforts, privacy-sensitive training data, and proprietary network characteristics. Consequently, the model value raises incentive for adversary to steal the model for profits, such as the representative model extraction attack. Emerging attack can leverage timing-sensitive architecture-level events (i.e., Arch-hints) disclosed in hardware platforms to extract DNN model layer information accurately. In this paper, we take the first step to uncover the root cause of such Arch-hints and summarize the principles to identify them. We then apply these principles to emerging Unified Memory (UM) management system and identify three new Arch-hints caused by UM's unique data movement patterns. We then develop a new extraction attack, UMProbe. We also create the first DNN benchmark suite in UM and utilize the benchmark suite to evaluate UMProbe. Our evaluation shows that UMProbe can extract the layer sequence with an accuracy of 95% for almost all victim test models, which thus calls for more attention to the DNN security in UM system.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. ShadowScope: GPU Monitoring and Validation via Composable Side Channel Signals

    cs.CR 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    ShadowScope detects GPU kernel attacks by segmenting kernel execution with marker functions and comparing PMU traces against pre-collected golden references, achieving up to 100% detection in its experiments.

  2. A Systematic Survey of Model Extraction Attacks and Defenses: State-of-the-Art and Perspectives

    cs.CR 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper classifies model extraction attacks and defenses into attack, defense, and computing environment categories and surveys their current state.

Pith tools