Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Bullshark: The Partially Synchronous Version

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2209.05633 v1 pith:U4YB5CHQ submitted 2022-09-12 cs.DC cs.CR

classification cs.DCcs.CR
keywords versionbullsharkpartiallysynchronousasynchronousdescriptionaudiencesimple
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The purpose of this manuscript is to describe the deterministic partially synchronous version of Bullshark in a simple and clean way. This result is published in CCS 2022, however, the description there is less clear because it uses the terminology of the full asynchronous Bullshark. The CCS version ties the description of the asynchronous and partially synchronous versions of Bullshark since it targets an academic audience. Due to the recent interest in DAG-based BFT protocols, we provide a separate and simple description of the partially synchronous version that targets a more general audience. We focus here on the DAG ordering logic. For more details about the asynchronous version, garbage collection, fairness, proofs, related work, evaluation, and efficient DAG implementation please refer to the fullpaper. An intuitive extended summary can be found in the "DAG meets BFT" blogpost.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Transaction Fee Mechanism Design for Leaderless Blockchain Protocols

    cs.GT 2025-05 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    The paper introduces a game-theoretic model and the FPA-EQ fee mechanism for multi-proposer blockchains, with a tight 63.2% welfare guarantee and matching impossibility results.

Pith tools