REVIEW 3 cited by
M$^2$-3DLaneNet: Exploring Multi-Modal 3D Lane Detection
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Estimating accurate lane lines in 3D space remains challenging due to their sparse and slim nature. Previous works mainly focused on using images for 3D lane detection, leading to inherent projection error and loss of geometry information. To address these issues, we explore the potential of leveraging LiDAR for 3D lane detection, either as a standalone method or in combination with existing monocular approaches. In this paper, we propose M$^2$-3DLaneNet to integrate complementary information from multiple sensors. Specifically, M$^2$-3DLaneNet lifts 2D features into 3D space by incorporating geometry information from LiDAR data through depth completion. Subsequently, the lifted 2D features are further enhanced with LiDAR features through cross-modality BEV fusion. Extensive experiments on the large-scale OpenLane dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of M$^2$-3DLaneNet, regardless of the range (75m or 100m).
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Depth3DLane: Fusing Monocular 3D Lane Detection with Self-Supervised Monocular Depth Estimation
Depth3DLane fuses self-supervised monocular depth with anchor-based lane detection, improving 3D lane spatial accuracy and enabling calibration-free operation.
-
Anchor3DLane++: 3D Lane Detection via Sample-Adaptive Sparse 3D Anchor Regression
Anchor3DLane++ predicts 3D lanes from front-view features using sample-adaptive sparse 3D anchors, improving F1 scores on OpenLane, ApolloSim, and ONCE-3DLanes beyond prior methods.
-
Monocular Lane Detection Based on Deep Learning: A Survey
A structured review of 2D and 3D monocular lane detection methods, with a new four-axis taxonomy and unified FPS comparisons.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.