REVIEW 1 cited by
Revisiting Crowd Counting: State-of-the-art, Trends, and Future Perspectives
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Crowd counting is an effective tool for situational awareness in public places. Automated crowd counting using images and videos is an interesting yet challenging problem that has gained significant attention in computer vision. Over the past few years, various deep learning methods have been developed to achieve state-of-the-art performance. The methods evolved over time vary in many aspects such as model architecture, input pipeline, learning paradigm, computational complexity, and accuracy gains etc. In this paper, we present a systematic and comprehensive review of the most significant contributions in the area of crowd counting. Although few surveys exist on the topic, our survey is most up-to date and different in several aspects. First, it provides a more meaningful categorization of the most significant contributions by model architectures, learning methods (i.e., loss functions), and evaluation methods (i.e., evaluation metrics). We chose prominent and distinct works and excluded similar works. We also sort the well-known crowd counting models by their performance over benchmark datasets. We believe that this survey can be a good resource for novice researchers to understand the progressive developments and contributions over time and the current state-of-the-art.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Crowd Detection Using Very-Fine-Resolution Satellite Imagery
A new dataset and point-based network show that individual people in 0.3 m satellite imagery can be detected with about 66% F1-score, a new capability for large-scale crowd analysis.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.