REVIEW 2 cited by
Survey on Applications of Neurosymbolic Artificial Intelligence
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
In recent years, the Neurosymbolic framework has attracted a lot of attention in various applications, from recommender systems and information retrieval to healthcare and finance. This success is due to its stellar performance combined with attractive properties, such as learning and reasoning. The new emerging Neurosymbolic field is currently experiencing a renaissance, as novel frameworks and algorithms motivated by various practical applications are being introduced, building on top of the classical neural and reasoning problem setting. This article aims to provide a comprehensive review of significant recent developments in real-world applications of Neurosymbolic Artificial Intelligence. Specifically, we introduce a taxonomy of common Neurosymbolic applications and summarize the state-of-the-art for each of those domains. Furthermore, we identify important current trends and provide new perspectives pertaining to the future of this burgeoning field.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Neuro-Symbolic Frameworks: Conceptual Characterization and Empirical Comparative Analysis
A facet-based comparison of DeepProbLog, Scallop, and DomiKnowS with efficiency measurements on four toy tasks, identifying challenges for future neurosymbolic frameworks.
-
Neuro-Symbolic AI in 2024: A Systematic Review
A systematic review of 158 Neuro-Symbolic AI papers finds research concentrated in learning and inference, with explainability, trustworthiness, and Meta-Cognition as underrepresented gaps.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.