REVIEW 1 cited by
Implicit Bias of Large Depth Networks: a Notion of Rank for Nonlinear Functions
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
We show that the representation cost of fully connected neural networks with homogeneous nonlinearities - which describes the implicit bias in function space of networks with $L_2$-regularization or with losses such as the cross-entropy - converges as the depth of the network goes to infinity to a notion of rank over nonlinear functions. We then inquire under which conditions the global minima of the loss recover the `true' rank of the data: we show that for too large depths the global minimum will be approximately rank 1 (underestimating the rank); we then argue that there is a range of depths which grows with the number of datapoints where the true rank is recovered. Finally, we discuss the effect of the rank of a classifier on the topology of the resulting class boundaries and show that autoencoders with optimal nonlinear rank are naturally denoising.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Understanding Nonlinear Implicit Bias via Region Counts in Input Space
Region count, the number of connected same-label regions along random input-space lines, correlates strongly with the generalization gap and is proposed as a reparameterization-invariant measure of nonlinear implicit bias.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.