Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Rainier: Reinforced Knowledge Introspector for Commonsense Question Answering

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.03078 v2 pith:Q7XF3JVA submitted 2022-10-06 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords knowledgecommonsensequestionansweringgeneratedgpt-3performancerainier
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Knowledge underpins reasoning. Recent research demonstrates that when relevant knowledge is provided as additional context to commonsense question answering (QA), it can substantially enhance the performance even on top of state-of-the-art. The fundamental challenge is where and how to find such knowledge that is high quality and on point with respect to the question; knowledge retrieved from knowledge bases are incomplete and knowledge generated from language models are inconsistent. We present Rainier, or Reinforced Knowledge Introspector, that learns to generate contextually relevant knowledge in response to given questions. Our approach starts by imitating knowledge generated by GPT-3, then learns to generate its own knowledge via reinforcement learning where rewards are shaped based on the increased performance on the resulting question answering. Rainier demonstrates substantial and consistent performance gains when tested over 9 different commonsense benchmarks: including 5 datasets that are seen during model training, as well as 4 datasets that are kept unseen. Our work is the first to report that knowledge generated by models that are orders of magnitude smaller than GPT-3, even without direct supervision on the knowledge itself, can exceed the quality of commonsense knowledge elicited from GPT-3.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Counterfactual Samples Constructing and Training for Commonsense Statements Estimation

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    CCSG trains plausibility estimators on counterfactual statements made by word replacement and dropout, reporting 3.07% higher average accuracy than the previous state of the art VERA+T5.

  2. Recursive Decomposition of Logical Thoughts: Framework for Superior Reasoning and Knowledge Propagation in Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-01 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A prompting framework that recursively decomposes reasoning tasks and self-scores candidate thoughts is reported to improve LLM accuracy on math and letter-concatenation benchmarks, though the headline improvement is ...

Pith tools