Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Evaluation Metrics for Object Detection for Autonomous Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.10298 v1 pith:EED6OOB5 submitted 2022-10-19 cs.RO cs.SYeess.SY

classification cs.ROcs.SYeess.SY
keywords objectdetectionmetricsrequirementsconfusionevaluationformalautonomous
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper studies the evaluation of learning-based object detection models in conjunction with model-checking of formal specifications defined on an abstract model of an autonomous system and its environment. In particular, we define two metrics -- \emph{proposition-labeled} and \emph{class-labeled} confusion matrices -- for evaluating object detection, and we incorporate these metrics to compute the satisfaction probability of system-level safety requirements. While confusion matrices have been effective for comparative evaluation of classification and object detection models, our framework fills two key gaps. First, we relate the performance of object detection to formal requirements defined over downstream high-level planning tasks. In particular, we provide empirical results that show that the choice of a good object detection algorithm, with respect to formal requirements on the overall system, significantly depends on the downstream planning and control design. Secondly, unlike the traditional confusion matrix, our metrics account for variations in performance with respect to the distance between the ego and the object being detected. We demonstrate this framework on a car-pedestrian example by computing the satisfaction probabilities for safety requirements formalized in Linear Temporal Logic (LTL).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Towards Unified Probabilistic Verification and Validation of Vision-Based Autonomy

    eess.SY 2025-08 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A pipeline that turns collected runs of a vision-based controller into an interval MDP, verifies a safety lower bound, and reuses Bayesian conformance to extend the bound to new environments.

  2. Contour Errors: Ego-Centric Matching for 3D Multi-Object Tracking Performance Evaluation

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A modified Hausdorff distance on ego-nearest bounding box corners is proposed as a 3D tracking matching criterion, showing more robust matches than IoU or center-point distance.

Pith tools