Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Differentially Private Language Models for Secure Data Sharing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.13918 v2 pith:KBSPUCKO submitted 2022-10-25 cs.LG cs.CLcs.CR

classification cs.LGcs.CLcs.CR
keywords datalanguageprivacytrainingdifferentialprivateclassifiersdatasets
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

To protect the privacy of individuals whose data is being shared, it is of high importance to develop methods allowing researchers and companies to release textual data while providing formal privacy guarantees to its originators. In the field of NLP, substantial efforts have been directed at building mechanisms following the framework of local differential privacy, thereby anonymizing individual text samples before releasing them. In practice, these approaches are often dissatisfying in terms of the quality of their output language due to the strong noise required for local differential privacy. In this paper, we approach the problem at hand using global differential privacy, particularly by training a generative language model in a differentially private manner and consequently sampling data from it. Using natural language prompts and a new prompt-mismatch loss, we are able to create highly accurate and fluent textual datasets taking on specific desired attributes such as sentiment or topic and resembling statistical properties of the training data. We perform thorough experiments indicating that our synthetic datasets do not leak information from our original data and are of high language quality and highly suitable for training models for further analysis on real-world data. Notably, we also demonstrate that training classifiers on private synthetic data outperforms directly training classifiers on real data with DP-SGD.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Balancing Utility and Privacy: Dynamically Private SGD with Random Projection

    cs.LG 2025-09 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    D2P2-SGD combines time-decreasing privacy noise with random projection to improve the accuracy of differentially private SGD, with convergence rates matching ordinary SGD.

  2. Improved Algorithms for Differentially Private Language Model Alignment

    cs.CR 2025-05 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    The central result is that DP-ADAMW/DP-ADAM outperform DP-SGD for private alignment, but the supporting evidence is internally inconsistent and the privacy analysis omits the number of gradient steps.

  3. How to DP-fy Your Data: A Practical Guide to Generating Synthetic Data With Differential Privacy

    cs.CR 2025-12 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A practical, extremely thorough survey of differentially private synthetic data generation: methods, privacy units, evaluation metrics, and end-to-end system components across four data modalities.

Pith tools