REVIEW 3 cited by
Text-Only Training for Image Captioning using Noise-Injected CLIP
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We consider the task of image-captioning using only the CLIP model and additional text data at training time, and no additional captioned images. Our approach relies on the fact that CLIP is trained to make visual and textual embeddings similar. Therefore, we only need to learn how to translate CLIP textual embeddings back into text, and we can learn how to do this by learning a decoder for the frozen CLIP text encoder using only text. We argue that this intuition is "almost correct" because of a gap between the embedding spaces, and propose to rectify this via noise injection during training. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach by showing SOTA zero-shot image captioning across four benchmarks, including style transfer. Code, data, and models are available on GitHub.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Modality Gap-Driven Subspace Alignment Training Paradigm For Multimodal Large Language Models
ReAlign corrects the modality gap in unpaired data to let MLLMs learn visual distributions from text alone before instruction tuning, reducing dependence on expensive paired corpora.
-
MoMa: Modulating Mamba for Adapting Image Foundation Models to Video Recognition
MoMa adapts frozen CLIP to video by injecting Mamba-computed scale and bias into each layer, improving accuracy and efficiency on multiple action recognition benchmarks.
-
Text to Image for Multi-Label Image Recognition with Joint Prompt-Adapter Learning
Synthetic images from text captions, combined with a shared prompt-adapter, improve multi-label image recognition and reduce CLIP's modality gap.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.