pith. sign in

arxiv: 2211.07069 · v8 · submitted 2022-11-14 · 🧮 math.RT

On the cocenter of the cyclotomic Hecke algebra of type G(r,1,n)

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 10:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.RT
keywords cyclotomic Hecke algebracocentercenterG(r,1,n)integral basescomplex reflection groupsKLR algebras
0
0 comments X

The pith

The dimensions of the cocenter and center of the cyclotomic Hecke algebra of type G(r,1,n) are independent of the characteristic of the ground field and the Hecke and cyclotomic parameters.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs integral bases for the cocenter of the cyclotomic Hecke algebra of type G(r,1,n) by generalizing a method used for Iwahori-Hecke algebras of finite Weyl groups. It establishes that the dimensions of both the cocenter and the center remain the same irrespective of the field's characteristic or the specific values of the parameters. This result verifies a conjecture about polynomial coefficients for the complex reflection group of type G(r,1,n) and extends the independence property to certain cyclotomic KLR algebras of affine type A.

Core claim

By generalizing Geck and Pfeiffer's construction of bases, integral bases are built for the cocenter of the cyclotomic Hecke algebra of type G(r,1,n). These bases imply that the dimensions of the cocenter and the center do not depend on the characteristic of the ground field, the Hecke parameter, or the cyclotomic parameters. The same independence holds for the cocenters and centers of certain cyclotomic KLR algebras of affine type A, and the construction verifies Chavli-Pfeiffer's conjecture on the polynomial coefficient g_{w,C} for G(r,1,n).

What carries the argument

Integral bases for the cocenter constructed by generalizing Geck and Pfeiffer's method from Iwahori-Hecke algebras to the cyclotomic setting of type G(r,1,n).

If this is right

  • The dimensions of the cocenter and center are the same in all characteristics and for all parameters.
  • Chavli-Pfeiffer's conjecture on g_{w,C} holds for the complex reflection group of type G(r,1,n).
  • Both the cocenters and centers of certain cyclotomic KLR algebras of affine type A have dimensions independent of the characteristic of the ground field.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The independence allows reducing questions about representations over arbitrary fields to the case of characteristic zero.
  • The construction of these bases may provide a template for studying cocenters in other classes of algebras associated to reflection groups.
  • If the bases are explicit enough, they could be used to compute the actual dimension as a function of n and r.

Load-bearing premise

The generalization of Geck and Pfeiffer's bases extends to the cyclotomic Hecke algebra without problems in the integral structure or the independence properties.

What would settle it

Finding a specific choice of n, r, characteristic p, and parameters where the dimension of the cocenter differs from the one computed over the rationals would disprove the independence claim.

read the original abstract

In this paper, we construct some integral bases for the cocenter of the cyclotomic Hecke algebra $\mathscr{H}_{n,K}$ of type $G(r,1,n)$ by generalizing Geck and Pfeiffer's work on the cocenters of the Iwahori-Hecke algebras associated to finite Weyl groups. We show that the dimensions of both the cocenter and the center of the cyclotomic Hecke algebra $\mathscr{H}_{n,K}$ are independent of the characteristic of the ground field, its Hecke parameter and cyclotomic parameters. As applications, we verify Chavli-Pfeiffer's conjecture on the polynomial coefficient $g_{w,C}$ for the complex reflection group of type $G(r,1,n)$ and also show that both the cocenters and the centers of certain cyclotomic KLR algebras of affine type $A$ are independent of the characteristic of the ground field.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper constructs integral bases for the cocenter of the cyclotomic Hecke algebra of type G(r,1,n) by generalizing Geck and Pfeiffer's bases for Iwahori-Hecke algebras of finite Weyl groups. It proves that the dimensions of both the cocenter and the center of H_{n,K} are independent of the characteristic of the ground field, the Hecke parameter, and the cyclotomic parameters. Applications include verifying the Chavli-Pfeiffer conjecture on the coefficients g_{w,C} for G(r,1,n) and establishing analogous independence for cocenters and centers of certain cyclotomic KLR algebras of affine type A.

Significance. If the generalization of the Geck-Pfeiffer construction holds with the claimed integral structure, the parameter-independence of the dimensions supplies a uniform computational tool across characteristics and specializations, which is valuable for the representation theory of complex reflection groups. The explicit verification of the conjecture for G(r,1,n) and the extension to KLR algebras are concrete contributions that strengthen the result.

minor comments (2)
  1. The notation for the parameters q and the cyclotomic parameters in the definition of H_{n,K} should be introduced with a brief reminder of the standard relations before the main constructions begin.
  2. In the applications section, the statement of Chavli-Pfeiffer's conjecture would benefit from an explicit citation to the original reference and a short restatement of the coefficient g_{w,C} being verified.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript and the recommendation for minor revision. The report contains no major comments.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained via external generalization

full rationale

The paper's core results rest on constructing integral bases for the cocenter by generalizing Geck-Pfeiffer's external construction for Weyl-group Iwahori-Hecke algebras, then proving dimension independence directly from those bases. No equations reduce a claimed prediction or dimension to a fitted input by construction, no load-bearing self-citations appear, and no uniqueness theorems are imported from the authors' prior work. The argument is a standard explicit extension whose validity is established by the proofs themselves rather than by definitional equivalence to the inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper relies on standard properties of Hecke algebras and prior results of Geck-Pfeiffer; no free parameters, invented entities, or ad-hoc axioms are visible in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard algebraic properties of cyclotomic Hecke algebras and their cocenters as defined in the literature
    Invoked implicitly when generalizing the Geck-Pfeiffer construction

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5691 in / 1354 out tokens · 19110 ms · 2026-05-24T10:38:57.659490+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Ariki , On the semi-simplicity of the Hecke algebra of (Z/rZ) ≀Sn, J

    S. Ariki , On the semi-simplicity of the Hecke algebra of (Z/rZ) ≀Sn, J. Alg., 169 (1994), 216–225

  2. [2]

    Ariki , On the decomposition numbers of the Hecke algebra of G(m, 1, n), J

    S. Ariki , On the decomposition numbers of the Hecke algebra of G(m, 1, n), J. Math. Kyoto Univ., 36 (1996), 789–808

  3. [3]

    Ariki and K

    S. Ariki and K. Koike , A Hecke algebra of (Z/rZ)≀Sn and construction of its representations , Adv. Math., 106 (1994), 216–243

  4. [4]

    Bremke and G

    K. Bremke and G. Malle , Reduced words and a length function for G(e, 1, n), Indag. Mathem., 8(4) (1997), 453–469

  5. [5]

    Brou ´e and G

    M. Brou ´e and G. Malle , Zyklotomische Heckealgebren , in: Repr´ esentations Unipotentes G´ en´ eriques et Blocs des Groupes R´ eductifs Finis, Ast´ erisque., 212 (1993), 119–189

  6. [6]

    Brundan , Centers of degenerate cyclotomic Hecke algebras and parabo lic category O, Rep- resent

    J. Brundan , Centers of degenerate cyclotomic Hecke algebras and parabo lic category O, Rep- resent. Theory, 12 (2008), 236–259

  7. [7]

    Brundan and A

    J. Brundan and A. Kleshchev , Blocks of cyclotomic Hecke algebras and Khovanov-Lauda algebras, Invent. Math., 178 (2009), 451–484

  8. [8]

    Brundan, A

    J. Brundan, A. Kleshchev and W. W ang , Graded Specht modules ,, J. reine angew. Math., 655 (2011), 61–87

  9. [9]

    Can , A length function and admissible diagrams for complex reflec tion groups G(m, 1, n), Kyungpook Math

    H. Can , A length function and admissible diagrams for complex reflec tion groups G(m, 1, n), Kyungpook Math. J., 45 (2005), 191–198. 49

  10. [10]

    Cherednik, A new interpretation of Gelfand-Tzetlin bases , Duke Math

    I.V. Cherednik, A new interpretation of Gelfand-Tzetlin bases , Duke Math. J., 54(2) (1987), 563–577

  11. [11]

    Chavli and G

    E. Chavli and G. Pfeiffer , Centers of Hecke algebras of complex reflection groups , Beitr. Algebra Geom., https://doi.org/10.1007/s13366-023-006 90-2, 2023

  12. [12]

    Dipper and G

    R. Dipper and G. James , Blocks and idempotents of Hecke algebras of general linear g roups, Proc. London Math. Soc., 54 (1987), 57–82

  13. [13]

    Dipper, G.D

    R. Dipper, G.D. James and A. Mathas , Cyclotomic q-Schur algebras , Math. Zeit., 229(3)(1998), 385–416

  14. [14]

    Dipper and A

    R. Dipper and A. Mathas , Morita equivalences of Ariki-Koike algebras , Math. Z., 240 (2002), 579–610

  15. [15]

    Evseev and A

    A. Evseev and A. Mathas, Content systems and deformations of cyclotomic KLR algebra s of type A and C, preprint, arXiv:2209.00134, 2022

  16. [16]

    Francis and J.J

    A.R. Francis and J.J. Graham , Centres of Hecke algebras: The Dipper–James conjecture , J. Alg., 306 (2006), 244–267

  17. [17]

    M. Geck, G. Pfeiffer , On the irreducible Characters of Hecke algebras , Adv. Math., 102 (1993), 79–94

  18. [18]

    Geck and G

    M. Geck and G. Pfeiffer , Characters of finite Coxeter groups and Iwahori-Hecke algeb ras, London Mathematical Society Monographs, 21, Oxford University Press, 2000

  19. [19]

    He and S

    X. He and S. Nie , Minimal length elements of extended affine Weyl groups , Compositio Math., 150 (2014), 1903–1927

  20. [20]

    Hu and F

    J. Hu and F. Li , On the modified affine Hecke algebras and quiver Hecke algebras of type A, J. Alg., 541 (2020), 219–269

  21. [21]

    Hu and H

    J. Hu and H. Lin , On the center conjecture for the cyclotomic KLR algebras , Int. Math. Res. Not, https://doi.org/10.1093/imrn/rnad100, (2023)

  22. [22]

    Hu and A

    J. Hu and A. Mathas , Graded cellular bases for the cyclotomic Khovanov-Lauda-R ouquier algebras of type A, Adv. Math., 225(2) (2010), 598–642

  23. [23]

    Ann., 364 (2016), 1189–1254

    , Seminormal forms and cyclotomic quiver Hecke algebras of t ype A, Math. Ann., 364 (2016), 1189–1254

  24. [24]

    J. Hu, X. Shi and L. Shi , On the minimal elements in conjugacy classes of the complex reflection group G(r, 1, n), to appear in J. Pure App. Algebra, (2024)

  25. [25]

    Kac , Infinite dimensional Lie algebras , 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, 1990

    V.G. Kac , Infinite dimensional Lie algebras , 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, 1990

  26. [26]

    S. J. Kang and M. Kashiw ara , Categorification of highest weight modules via Khovanov- Lauda-Rouquier algebras, Invent. Math., 190 (2012), 699–742

  27. [27]

    Khovanov and A.D

    M. Khovanov and A.D. Lauda , A diagrammatic approach to categorification of quantum groups, I , Represent. Theory, 13 (2009), 309–347

  28. [28]

    , A diagrammatic approach to categorification of quantum grou ps, II , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 363 (2011), 2685–2700

  29. [29]

    L yle and A

    S. L yle and A. Mathas , Blocks of cyclotomic Hecke algebras , Adv. Math., 216 (2007), 854–878

  30. [30]

    Malle , On the Rationality and Fake Degrees of Characters of Cycloto mic Algebras, Jour- nal of Mathematical Sciences-University of Tokyo, 6 (1999), 647–678

    G. Malle , On the Rationality and Fake Degrees of Characters of Cycloto mic Algebras, Jour- nal of Mathematical Sciences-University of Tokyo, 6 (1999), 647–678

  31. [31]

    Malle and A

    G. Malle and A. Mathas , Symmetric cyclotomic Hecke algebras , J. Algebra, 205(1), (1998), 275–293

  32. [32]

    Mathas , Murphy operators and the centre of the Iwahori-Hecke algebr as of type A

    A. Mathas , Murphy operators and the centre of the Iwahori-Hecke algebr as of type A. J. Algebraic Combin., 9 (1999), 295–313

  33. [33]

    Alg., 281 (2004), 695–730

    , Matrix units and generic degrees for the Ariki-Koike algebr as, J. Alg., 281 (2004), 695–730

  34. [34]

    Mathas and D

    A. Mathas and D. Tubbenhauer , Subdivision and cellularity for weighted KLR W algebras , Math. Anna., https://doi.org/10.1007/s00208-023-02660 -4, 2023

  35. [35]

    Mathas and D

    A. Mathas and D. Tubbenhauer , Cellularity for weighted KLR W algebras of types B, A(2), D(2), J. London Math. Soc., 107(2) (2023), 1002–1044

  36. [36]

    Mcgerty , On the center of the cyclotomic Hecke algebra of G(m, 1, 2), Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society, 55 (2012), 497–506

    K. Mcgerty , On the center of the cyclotomic Hecke algebra of G(m, 1, 2), Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society, 55 (2012), 497–506

  37. [37]

    Mcgerty, T

    K. Mcgerty, T. Nevins , Kirwan surjectivity for quiver varieties , Invent. math., 212 (2018), 61-C187

  38. [38]

    Nakajima , Quiver varieties and finite dimensional representations of quantum affine algebras, J

    H. Nakajima , Quiver varieties and finite dimensional representations of quantum affine algebras, J. Amer. Math. Soc., 14 (2000), 145–238

  39. [39]

    Rouquier , Quiver Hecke algebras and 2-Lie algebras , Algebr

    R. Rouquier , Quiver Hecke algebras and 2-Lie algebras , Algebr. Colloq. 19 (2012), 359–410

  40. [40]

    Salim , Cyclotomic Yokonuma-Hecke algebras are cyclotomic quiver Hecke algebras, Adv

    R. Salim , Cyclotomic Yokonuma-Hecke algebras are cyclotomic quiver Hecke algebras, Adv. Math., 311 (2017), 662–729

  41. [41]

    P. Shan, M. V aragnolo and E. V asserot , On the center of quiver-Hecke algebras , Duke Math. J., 166(6) (2017), 1005–1101. 50 JUN HU AND CORRESPONDING AUTHOR

  42. [42]

    Centers of KLR algebras and cohomology rings of quiver varieties

    B. Webster , Center of KLR algebras and cohomology rings of quiver variet ies, preprint, math.RT/1504.04401v2, 2015. Key Laboratory of Algebraic Lie Theory and Analysis of Ministr y of Education, School of Mathematics and Statistics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081, P.R. China Email address : junhu404@bit.edu.cn School of Mathematics and ...