Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

mFACE: Multilingual Summarization with Factual Consistency Evaluation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2212.10622 v2 pith:BUT2LPJV submitted 2022-12-20 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords modelsevaluationfactualmultilingualsummarizationconsistencylanguagerecent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Abstractive summarization has enjoyed renewed interest in recent years, thanks to pre-trained language models and the availability of large-scale datasets. Despite promising results, current models still suffer from generating factually inconsistent summaries, reducing their utility for real-world application. Several recent efforts attempt to address this by devising models that automatically detect factual inconsistencies in machine generated summaries. However, they focus exclusively on English, a language with abundant resources. In this work, we leverage factual consistency evaluation models to improve multilingual summarization. We explore two intuitive approaches to mitigate hallucinations based on the signal provided by a multilingual NLI model, namely data filtering and controlled generation. Experimental results in the 45 languages from the XLSum dataset show gains over strong baselines in both automatic and human evaluation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. EvoPat: A Multi-LLM-based Patents Summarization and Analysis Agent

    cs.DL 2024-12 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    EvoPat uses five specialized LLM roles with retrieval and web search to summarize and compare patents, and the authors report it outperforms GPT-4o, though evaluative details are incomplete.

Pith tools