Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Improving Human-AI Collaboration With Descriptions of AI Behavior

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2301.06937 v1 pith:M4LODQNR submitted 2023-01-06 cs.HC cs.AI

classification cs.HCcs.AI
keywords peoplebehaviordescriptionshuman-aiclassificationcollaborationdecisionimprove
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

People work with AI systems to improve their decision making, but often under- or over-rely on AI predictions and perform worse than they would have unassisted. To help people appropriately rely on AI aids, we propose showing them behavior descriptions, details of how AI systems perform on subgroups of instances. We tested the efficacy of behavior descriptions through user studies with 225 participants in three distinct domains: fake review detection, satellite image classification, and bird classification. We found that behavior descriptions can increase human-AI accuracy through two mechanisms: helping people identify AI failures and increasing people's reliance on the AI when it is more accurate. These findings highlight the importance of people's mental models in human-AI collaboration and show that informing people of high-level AI behaviors can significantly improve AI-assisted decision making.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools