Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Specializing Smaller Language Models towards Multi-Step Reasoning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2301.12726 v1 pith:YA6EVEET submitted 2023-01-30 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords modelsmodelabilityreasoningsmallertowardsabilitiesimportant
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

The surprising ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) to perform well on complex reasoning with only few-shot chain-of-thought prompts is believed to emerge only in very large-scale models (100+ billion parameters). We show that such abilities can, in fact, be distilled down from GPT-3.5 ($\ge$ 175B) to T5 variants ($\le$ 11B). We propose model specialization, to specialize the model's ability towards a target task. The hypothesis is that large models (commonly viewed as larger than 100B) have strong modeling power, but are spread on a large spectrum of tasks. Small models (commonly viewed as smaller than 10B) have limited model capacity, but if we concentrate their capacity on a specific target task, the model can achieve a decent improved performance. We use multi-step math reasoning as our testbed because it is a very typical emergent ability. We show two important aspects of model abilities: (1). there exists a very complex balance/ tradeoff between language models' multi-dimensional abilities; (2). by paying the price of decreased generic ability, we can clearly lift up the scaling curve of models smaller than 10B towards a specialized multi-step math reasoning ability. We further give comprehensive discussions about important design choices for better generalization, including the tuning data format, the start model checkpoint, and a new model selection method. We hope our practice and discoveries can serve as an important attempt towards specialized smaller models in the new research paradigm set by LLMs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 43 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Rationales Are Not Silver Bullets: Measuring the Impact of Rationales on Model Performance and Reliability

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Rationale-augmented finetuning can hurt accuracy while improving calibration, with the sizes of both effects tied linearly to task difficulty.

  2. LLM-as-a-Coach: Experiential Learning for Non-Verifiable Tasks

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Training a language model by distilling a coach's written experiential knowledge beats training on a scalar rubric score for open-ended tasks, with better out-of-distribution transfer.

  3. MaskSearch: A Universal Pre-Training Framework to Enhance Agentic Search Capability

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A pre-training task called RAMP, where models practice searching to fill masked text spans, improves downstream agentic open-domain QA performance across Qwen and LLaMA models.

  4. Enhancing LLMs' Reasoning-Intensive Multimedia Search Capabilities through Fine-Tuning and Reinforcement Learning

    cs.IR 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A two-stage fine-tuning and reinforcement-learning method makes LLMs generate token-efficient natural-language search plans, reporting strong accuracy gains on financial and news search benchmarks.

Pith tools