Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

DepGraph: Towards Any Structural Pruning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2301.12900 v2 pith:G37SYSLW submitted 2023-01-30 cs.AI cs.CV

classification cs.AIcs.CV
keywords pruningstructuralmethodparametersarchitecturesconsistentlydependencydepgraph
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Structural pruning enables model acceleration by removing structurally-grouped parameters from neural networks. However, the parameter-grouping patterns vary widely across different models, making architecture-specific pruners, which rely on manually-designed grouping schemes, non-generalizable to new architectures. In this work, we study a highly-challenging yet barely-explored task, any structural pruning, to tackle general structural pruning of arbitrary architecture like CNNs, RNNs, GNNs and Transformers. The most prominent obstacle towards this goal lies in the structural coupling, which not only forces different layers to be pruned simultaneously, but also expects all removed parameters to be consistently unimportant, thereby avoiding structural issues and significant performance degradation after pruning. To address this problem, we propose a general and {fully automatic} method, \emph{Dependency Graph} (DepGraph), to explicitly model the dependency between layers and comprehensively group coupled parameters for pruning. In this work, we extensively evaluate our method on several architectures and tasks, including ResNe(X)t, DenseNet, MobileNet and Vision transformer for images, GAT for graph, DGCNN for 3D point cloud, alongside LSTM for language, and demonstrate that, even with a simple norm-based criterion, the proposed method consistently yields gratifying performances.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Loss-Aware Automatic Selection of Structured Pruning Criteria for Deep Neural Network Acceleration

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LAASP prunes neural networks during training by greedily selecting the best layer and filter-importance criterion at each step using the network's loss on a data subset.

  2. Model Fusion via Neuron Transplantation

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new fusion method, Neuron Transplantation, concatenates ensemble members and prunes back down to a single model's size, outperforming individual models after fine-tuning.

Pith tools