REVIEW 2 cited by
Energy Efficiency of Training Neural Network Architectures: An Empirical Study
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
The evaluation of Deep Learning models has traditionally focused on criteria such as accuracy, F1 score, and related measures. The increasing availability of high computational power environments allows the creation of deeper and more complex models. However, the computations needed to train such models entail a large carbon footprint. In this work, we study the relations between DL model architectures and their environmental impact in terms of energy consumed and CO$_2$ emissions produced during training by means of an empirical study using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. Concretely, we study: (i) the impact of the architecture and the location where the computations are hosted on the energy consumption and emissions produced; (ii) the trade-off between accuracy and energy efficiency; and (iii) the difference on the method of measurement of the energy consumed using software-based and hardware-based tools.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Energy Consumption in Parallel Neural Network Training
Energy use in data-parallel neural network training grows roughly linearly with GPU hours, but the energy cost per GPU hour varies by model, hardware, and the number of samples and gradient updates per GPU hour.
-
EBA-AI: Ethics-Guided Bias-Aware AI for Efficient Underwater Image Enhancement and Coral Reef Monitoring
EBA-AI uses a CLIP threshold to skip clear underwater images before enhancement, trading about 0.5 to 0.8 dB PSNR for skipped computation, while fairness and energy savings are asserted, not measured.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.