Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

State-wise Safe Reinforcement Learning: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.03122 v3 pith:RHGNPTUF submitted 2023-02-06 cs.LG cs.AIcs.RO

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.RO
keywords constraintsstate-wisesafetyapplicationsapproacheschallengingdiscussexisting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Despite the tremendous success of Reinforcement Learning (RL) algorithms in simulation environments, applying RL to real-world applications still faces many challenges. A major concern is safety, in another word, constraint satisfaction. State-wise constraints are one of the most common constraints in real-world applications and one of the most challenging constraints in Safe RL. Enforcing state-wise constraints is necessary and essential to many challenging tasks such as autonomous driving, robot manipulation. This paper provides a comprehensive review of existing approaches that address state-wise constraints in RL. Under the framework of State-wise Constrained Markov Decision Process (SCMDP), we will discuss the connections, differences, and trade-offs of existing approaches in terms of (i) safety guarantee and scalability, (ii) safety and reward performance, and (iii) safety after convergence and during training. We also summarize limitations of current methods and discuss potential future directions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Combee: Scaling Prompt Learning for Self-Improving Language Model Agents

    cs.AI 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Mastery-conditioned constrained RL expands the instructional action set only when prerequisites are mastered, reducing reward hacking and raising mastery gains on Junyi and XES3G5M.

  2. Leveraging Constraint Violation Signals For Action-Constrained Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new method trains normalizing flows using constraint violation signals to map latent actions to feasible actions, reducing constraint violations by over 10x in several RL control benchmarks.

  3. Action Mapping for Reinforcement Learning in Continuous Environments with Constraints

    cs.LG 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Decoupling feasibility from objective optimization by training the RL policy over latent actions that map to feasible actions improves sample efficiency and constraint satisfaction in continuous constrained RL.

Pith tools