Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

BiasTestGPT: Using ChatGPT for Social Bias Testing of Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.07371 v3 pith:22HIJGKS submitted 2023-02-14 cs.CL cs.CY

classification cs.CLcs.CY
keywords socialtestbiastestingbiasessentencesplmsattributes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Pretrained Language Models (PLMs) harbor inherent social biases that can result in harmful real-world implications. Such social biases are measured through the probability values that PLMs output for different social groups and attributes appearing in a set of test sentences. However, bias testing is currently cumbersome since the test sentences are generated either from a limited set of manual templates or need expensive crowd-sourcing. We instead propose using ChatGPT for the controllable generation of test sentences, given any arbitrary user-specified combination of social groups and attributes appearing in the test sentences. When compared to template-based methods, our approach using ChatGPT for test sentence generation is superior in detecting social bias, especially in challenging settings such as intersectional biases. We present an open-source comprehensive bias testing framework (BiasTestGPT), hosted on HuggingFace, that can be plugged into any open-source PLM for bias testing. User testing with domain experts from various fields has shown their interest in being able to test modern AI for social biases. Our tool has significantly improved their awareness of such biases in PLMs, proving to be learnable and user-friendly. We thus enable seamless open-ended social bias testing of PLMs by domain experts through an automatic large-scale generation of diverse test sentences for any combination of social categories and attributes.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. From Seed to Harvest: Augmenting Human Creativity with AI for Red-teaming Text-to-Image Models

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Seed2Harvest expands 1,000 human adversarial prompts into 27,650 LLM-generated variants that keep roughly comparable unsafe-image trigger rates and add hundreds of new geographic contexts.

  2. Exploring Gender Bias Beyond Occupational Titles

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper presents GenderLexicon and a ClozeGender score, reporting that action verbs and object nouns carry gender bias beyond occupational stereotypes in English and Japanese language models.

  3. Self-Anchored Attention Model for Sample-Efficient Classification of Prosocial Text Chat

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A self-anchored attention classifier using the whole training set as anchor features achieves 0.836 AUC for prosocial chat in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II, 7.9% above the best benchmark.

Pith tools