REVIEW 2 cited by
Active Membership Inference Attack under Local Differential Privacy in Federated Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Federated learning (FL) was originally regarded as a framework for collaborative learning among clients with data privacy protection through a coordinating server. In this paper, we propose a new active membership inference (AMI) attack carried out by a dishonest server in FL. In AMI attacks, the server crafts and embeds malicious parameters into global models to effectively infer whether a target data sample is included in a client's private training data or not. By exploiting the correlation among data features through a non-linear decision boundary, AMI attacks with a certified guarantee of success can achieve severely high success rates under rigorous local differential privacy (LDP) protection; thereby exposing clients' training data to significant privacy risk. Theoretical and experimental results on several benchmark datasets show that adding sufficient privacy-preserving noise to prevent our attack would significantly damage FL's model utility.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Securing Genomic Data Against Inference Attacks in Federated Learning Environments
In a synthetic federated learning setup with 100-SNP genomic data, a gradient-norm membership inference attack reached 0.87 F1-score, outperforming confidence-based membership inference and label inference attacks.
-
DP-FedLoRA: Privacy-Enhanced Federated Fine-Tuning for On-Device Large Language Models
DP-FedLoRA clips and adds Gaussian noise to per-client LoRA matrices in federated LLM fine-tuning, claiming unbiased updates and bounded variance, but the privacy calibration and experiments have significant gaps.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.