Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

AugGPT: Leveraging ChatGPT for Text Data Augmentation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.13007 v3 pith:USL6N2AB submitted 2023-02-25 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords dataaugmentationtextauggptsampleschatgptlanguageapproach
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Text data augmentation is an effective strategy for overcoming the challenge of limited sample sizes in many natural language processing (NLP) tasks. This challenge is especially prominent in the few-shot learning scenario, where the data in the target domain is generally much scarcer and of lowered quality. A natural and widely-used strategy to mitigate such challenges is to perform data augmentation to better capture the data invariance and increase the sample size. However, current text data augmentation methods either can't ensure the correct labeling of the generated data (lacking faithfulness) or can't ensure sufficient diversity in the generated data (lacking compactness), or both. Inspired by the recent success of large language models, especially the development of ChatGPT, which demonstrated improved language comprehension abilities, in this work, we propose a text data augmentation approach based on ChatGPT (named AugGPT). AugGPT rephrases each sentence in the training samples into multiple conceptually similar but semantically different samples. The augmented samples can then be used in downstream model training. Experiment results on few-shot learning text classification tasks show the superior performance of the proposed AugGPT approach over state-of-the-art text data augmentation methods in terms of testing accuracy and distribution of the augmented samples.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Backtranslation and paraphrasing in the LLM era? Comparing data augmentation methods for emotion classification

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Backtranslation and paraphrasing produce competitive or better classification gains than zero-shot and few-shot generation when augmenting a low-resource emotion dataset.

  2. What Matters in LLM-generated Data: Diversity and Its Effect on Model Fine-Tuning

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Moderately diverse LLM-generated data can improve fine-tuned model performance in low-data settings when distribution shift is minimal, while high diversity or large distribution shift hurts.

  3. Evaluating Multimodal Large Language Models on Video Captioning via Monte Carlo Tree Search

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    AutoCaption uses MCTS to generate fine-grained video key points, forming the MCTS-VCB benchmark that ranks MLLMs and yields training data improving a fine-tuned model's captioning.

Pith tools