REVIEW 3 cited by
Beyond the limitations of any imaginable mechanism: large language models and psycholinguistics
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large language models are not detailed models of human linguistic processing. They are, however, extremely successful at their primary task: providing a model for language. For this reason and because there are no animal models for language, large language models are important in psycholinguistics: they are useful as a practical tool, as an illustrative comparative, and philosophically, as a basis for recasting the relationship between language and thought.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Multi-granular Training Strategies for Robust Multi-hop Reasoning Over Noisy and Heterogeneous Knowledge Sources
AMKOR is described as a state-of-the-art multi-hop QA system, but the paper provides no reproducible evidence and the reported numbers appear unverifiable.
-
Generalization of Medical Large Language Models through Cross-Domain Weak Supervision
A claimed curriculum-based fine-tuning framework for medical LLMs reports better question answering and response generation, but lacks reproducible evidence.
-
Weak Supervision Dynamic KL-Weighted Diffusion Models Guided by Large Language Models
A vague proposal for LLM-guided diffusion with dynamic KL weighting, backed by unsupported FID/IS tables.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.