Pith. sign in

REVIEW

The human factor: results of a small-angle scattering data analysis Round Robin

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2303.03772 v1 pith:6ZMELDHA submitted 2023-03-07 physics.data-an cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.app-ph

Brian R. Pauw , Glen J. Smales , Andy S. Anker , Daniel M. Balazs , Frederick L. Beyer , Ralf Bienert , Wim G. Bouwman , Ingo Bre{ss}ler
show 41 more authors
Joachim Breternitz Erik S Brok Gary Bryant Andrew J. Clulow Erin R. Crater Frédéric De Geuser Alessandra Del Giudice Jérôme Deumer Sabrina Disch Shankar Dutt Kilian Frank Emiliano Fratini Elliot P. Gilbert Marc Benjamin Hahn James Hallett Max Hohenschutz Martin Hollamby Steven Huband Jan Ilavsky Johanna K. Jochum Mikkel Juelsholt Bradley W. Mansel Paavo Penttilä Rebecca K. Pittkowski Giuseppe Portale Lilo D. Pozzo Paulo Ricardo de Abreu Furtado Garcia Leonhard Rochels Julian M. Rosalie Patrick E. J. Saloga Susanne Seibt Andrew J. Smith Gregory N. Smith Venkatasamy Annadurai Glenn A. Spiering Tomasz M. Stawski Olivier Taché Andreas F. Thünemann Kristof Toth Andrew E. Whitten Joachim Wuttke
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.data-ancond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.app-ph
keywords datasetsanalysisentrieshalfrobinroundweredata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

A Round Robin study has been carried out to estimate the impact of the human element in small-angle scattering data analysis. Four corrected datasets were provided to participants ready for analysis. All datasets were measured on samples containing spherical scatterers, with two datasets in dilute dispersions, and two from powders. Most of the 46 participants correctly identified the number of populations in the dilute dispersions, with half of the population mean entries within 1.5% and half of the population width entries within 40%, respectively. Due to the added complexity of the structure factor, much fewer people submitted answers on the powder datasets. For those that did, half of the entries for the means and widths were within 44% and 86% respectively. This Round Robin experiment highlights several causes for the discrepancies, for which solutions are proposed.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools