Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Exploring the Relevance of Data Privacy-Enhancing Technologies for AI Governance Use Cases

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2303.08956 v2 pith:LFMYP6QZ submitted 2023-03-15 cs.AI cs.CR

classification cs.AIcs.CR
keywords governancesystemauditingcasesdatadifferentprivacy-enhancingsignificant
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The development of privacy-enhancing technologies has made immense progress in reducing trade-offs between privacy and performance in data exchange and analysis. Similar tools for structured transparency could be useful for AI governance by offering capabilities such as external scrutiny, auditing, and source verification. It is useful to view these different AI governance objectives as a system of information flows in order to avoid partial solutions and significant gaps in governance, as there may be significant overlap in the software stacks needed for the AI governance use cases mentioned in this text. When viewing the system as a whole, the importance of interoperability between these different AI governance solutions becomes clear. Therefore, it is imminently important to look at these problems in AI governance as a system, before these standards, auditing procedures, software, and norms settle into place.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. GPAI Evaluations Standards Taskforce: Towards Effective AI Governance

    cs.CY 2024-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The paper proposes an EU GPAI Evaluation Standards Taskforce to develop adaptive standards for AI evaluations, based on four desiderata: internal validity, external validity, reproducibility, and portability.

Pith tools