Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Logical Reasoning over Natural Language as Knowledge Representation: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2303.12023 v2 pith:RYDOTOZ4 submitted 2023-03-21 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords reasoninglanguagelogicalrepresentationparadigmformalknowledgeabductive
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Logical reasoning is central to human cognition and intelligence. It includes deductive, inductive, and abductive reasoning. Past research of logical reasoning within AI uses formal language as knowledge representation and symbolic reasoners. However, reasoning with formal language has proved challenging (e.g., brittleness and knowledge-acquisition bottleneck). This paper provides a comprehensive overview on a new paradigm of logical reasoning, which uses natural language as knowledge representation and pretrained language models as reasoners, including philosophical definition and categorization of logical reasoning, advantages of the new paradigm, benchmarks and methods, challenges of the new paradigm, possible future directions, and relation to related NLP fields. This new paradigm is promising since it not only alleviates many challenges of formal representation but also has advantages over end-to-end neural methods. This survey focus on transformer-based LLMs explicitly working on deductive, inductive, and abductive reasoning over English representation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Rule2Text: A Framework for Generating and Evaluating Natural Language Explanations of Knowledge Graph Rules

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Rule2Text generates and evaluates natural language explanations of knowledge graph rules, finding that chain-of-thought prompting with entity types works best and that fine-tuning Zephyr on LLM-built ground truth shar...

  2. Rule2Text: Natural Language Explanation of Logical Rules in Knowledge Graphs

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLMs generate mostly correct and clear explanations of knowledge-graph logical rules, and combining chain-of-thought prompting with entity type hints improves quality.

Pith tools