Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Segment Anything Model (SAM) for Digital Pathology: Assess Zero-shot Segmentation on Whole Slide Imaging

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2304.04155 v1 pith:7HGAEUPU submitted 2023-04-09 eess.IV cs.CV

classification eess.IVcs.CV
keywords segmentationmodelimageperformancezero-shotdigitalpathologyachieve
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The segment anything model (SAM) was released as a foundation model for image segmentation. The promptable segmentation model was trained by over 1 billion masks on 11M licensed and privacy-respecting images. The model supports zero-shot image segmentation with various segmentation prompts (e.g., points, boxes, masks). It makes the SAM attractive for medical image analysis, especially for digital pathology where the training data are rare. In this study, we evaluate the zero-shot segmentation performance of SAM model on representative segmentation tasks on whole slide imaging (WSI), including (1) tumor segmentation, (2) non-tumor tissue segmentation, (3) cell nuclei segmentation. Core Results: The results suggest that the zero-shot SAM model achieves remarkable segmentation performance for large connected objects. However, it does not consistently achieve satisfying performance for dense instance object segmentation, even with 20 prompts (clicks/boxes) on each image. We also summarized the identified limitations for digital pathology: (1) image resolution, (2) multiple scales, (3) prompt selection, and (4) model fine-tuning. In the future, the few-shot fine-tuning with images from downstream pathological segmentation tasks might help the model to achieve better performance in dense object segmentation.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LoD-Loc v2: Aerial Visual Localization over Low Level-of-Detail City Models using Explicit Silhouette Alignment

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LoD-Loc v2 localizes aerial cameras by aligning predicted building silhouettes with rendered low-detail city-model silhouettes, achieving accurate 4-DoF pose without textured maps.

  2. TAGS: 3D Tumor-Adaptive Guidance for SAM

    eess.IV 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A SAM-based 3D tumor segmentation framework combining TotalSegmentator organ masks, CLIP text guidance, and multi-stage adapters outperforms several medical segmentation baselines on three CT datasets.

  3. Prompt Mechanisms in Medical Imaging: A Comprehensive Survey

    eess.IV 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A broad survey that organizes prompt mechanisms for medical image generation, segmentation, and classification into a two-dimensional taxonomy of core technologies and clinical applications.

Pith tools