REVIEW 7 cited by
OpenAssistant Conversations -- Democratizing Large Language Model Alignment
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences has proven to drastically improve usability and has driven rapid adoption as demonstrated by ChatGPT. Alignment techniques such as supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) greatly reduce the required skill and domain knowledge to effectively harness the capabilities of LLMs, increasing their accessibility and utility across various domains. However, state-of-the-art alignment techniques like RLHF rely on high-quality human feedback data, which is expensive to create and often remains proprietary. In an effort to democratize research on large-scale alignment, we release OpenAssistant Conversations, a human-generated, human-annotated assistant-style conversation corpus consisting of 161,443 messages in 35 different languages, annotated with 461,292 quality ratings, resulting in over 10,000 complete and fully annotated conversation trees. The corpus is a product of a worldwide crowd-sourcing effort involving over 13,500 volunteers. Models trained on OpenAssistant Conversations show consistent improvements on standard benchmarks over respective base models. We release our code and data under a fully permissive licence.
Forward citations
Cited by 7 Pith papers
-
Preference learning made easy: Everything should be understood through win rate
Under two axioms (preference-consistency and prevalence-consistency), the only distribution-grounded evaluation for preference learning is h-win rate, and most popular alignment methods can be classified by whether th...
-
LLM-as-a-Coach: Experiential Learning for Non-Verifiable Tasks
Training a language model by distilling a coach's written experiential knowledge beats training on a scalar rubric score for open-ended tasks, with better out-of-distribution transfer.
-
Tiny Reward Models
TinyRM shows that 400M-parameter bidirectional masked language models, tuned with FLAN-style prompting, DoRA, and layer freezing, outperform a 70B reward model on RewardBench reasoning and come close on safety.
-
The Common Pile v0.1: An 8TB Dataset of Public Domain and Openly Licensed Text
A new 8TB openly-licensed text corpus trains 7B LLMs that are competitive with Llama 1/2, showing that performant models need not depend on unlicensed web data.
-
Trading Human Curation for Synthetic Augmentation in RLVR
Gated synthetic augmentations of a 10-task human base substitute for ~87 extra human RLVR tasks on aggregate held-out pass@1, with cost-adjusted trade rate ρ_cost in [1.4×, 11.6×].
-
A Survey on Evaluating Quality and Trustworthiness in LLM-Generated Data
A metric-oriented survey that classifies intrinsic quality and trustworthiness metrics for LLM-generated data across six modalities and documents systematic evaluation gaps in the current literature.
-
Salamandra Technical Report
Salamandra is an open, from-scratch multilingual LLM family with 2B, 7B, and 40B checkpoints, instruction-tuned variants, a vision proof-of-concept, and detailed evaluations across Iberian and European languages.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.