Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Efficient Deep Reinforcement Learning Requires Regulating Overfitting

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2304.10466 v1 pith:FPFYADTM submitted 2023-04-20 cs.LG cs.AIstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIstat.ML
keywords deeperrorvalidationlearningacrossalgorithmscontroldata-efficient
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep reinforcement learning algorithms that learn policies by trial-and-error must learn from limited amounts of data collected by actively interacting with the environment. While many prior works have shown that proper regularization techniques are crucial for enabling data-efficient RL, a general understanding of the bottlenecks in data-efficient RL has remained unclear. Consequently, it has been difficult to devise a universal technique that works well across all domains. In this paper, we attempt to understand the primary bottleneck in sample-efficient deep RL by examining several potential hypotheses such as non-stationarity, excessive action distribution shift, and overfitting. We perform thorough empirical analysis on state-based DeepMind control suite (DMC) tasks in a controlled and systematic way to show that high temporal-difference (TD) error on the validation set of transitions is the main culprit that severely affects the performance of deep RL algorithms, and prior methods that lead to good performance do in fact, control the validation TD error to be low. This observation gives us a robust principle for making deep RL efficient: we can hill-climb on the validation TD error by utilizing any form of regularization techniques from supervised learning. We show that a simple online model selection method that targets the validation TD error is effective across state-based DMC and Gym tasks.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Optimistic critics can empower small actors

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Optimistic critic estimates (mean or max over two Q functions) counteract value underestimation and recover most of the performance lost by shrinking the actor in SAC and DrQ.

  2. A Forget-and-Grow Strategy for Deep Reinforcement Learning Scaling in Continuous Control

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Forget and Grow (FoG) combines decaying replay weights for old experiences with progressive critic-network expansion to improve continuous-control reinforcement learning, beating BRO, SimBa, and TD-MPC2 on most of 41 ...

Pith tools