REVIEW 3 cited by
SkillGPT: a RESTful API service for skill extraction and standardization using a Large Language Model
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We present SkillGPT, a tool for skill extraction and standardization (SES) from free-style job descriptions and user profiles with an open-source Large Language Model (LLM) as backbone. Most previous methods for similar tasks either need supervision or rely on heavy data-preprocessing and feature engineering. Directly prompting the latest conversational LLM for standard skills, however, is slow, costly and inaccurate. In contrast, SkillGPT utilizes a LLM to perform its tasks in steps via summarization and vector similarity search, to balance speed with precision. The backbone LLM of SkillGPT is based on Llama, free for academic use and thus useful for exploratory research and prototype development. Hence, our cost-free SkillGPT gives users the convenience of conversational SES, efficiently and reliably.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
STEP: Career-Path Recommendation via Temporal and Educational Trajectory Modeling
STEP, with ROUTE embeddings and JobHop v2, sets new next-job prediction SOTA on four ESCO career-trajectory benchmarks by modeling inter-job time and education.
-
JobHop v2: A Large-Scale Career Trajectory Dataset from Unstructured Resumes
JobHop v2 releases 355,315 ESCO-annotated career trajectories with temporal and education fields, extracted by a reasoning-controlled LLM pipeline from real VDAB resumes at near inter-annotator quality.
-
(Towards) Scalable Reliable Automated Evaluation with Large Language Models
Multi-LLM pairwise Elo ranking with adjustable consensus thresholds produces rankings of competency profiles that average Spearman ρ≈0.83 with expert judgments.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.