REVIEW 6 cited by
Fundamental Limitations of Alignment in Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
An important aspect in developing language models that interact with humans is aligning their behavior to be useful and unharmful for their human users. This is usually achieved by tuning the model in a way that enhances desired behaviors and inhibits undesired ones, a process referred to as alignment. In this paper, we propose a theoretical approach called Behavior Expectation Bounds (BEB) which allows us to formally investigate several inherent characteristics and limitations of alignment in large language models. Importantly, we prove that within the limits of this framework, for any behavior that has a finite probability of being exhibited by the model, there exist prompts that can trigger the model into outputting this behavior, with probability that increases with the length of the prompt. This implies that any alignment process that attenuates an undesired behavior but does not remove it altogether, is not safe against adversarial prompting attacks. Furthermore, our framework hints at the mechanism by which leading alignment approaches such as reinforcement learning from human feedback make the LLM prone to being prompted into the undesired behaviors. This theoretical result is being experimentally demonstrated in large scale by the so called contemporary "chatGPT jailbreaks", where adversarial users trick the LLM into breaking its alignment guardrails by triggering it into acting as a malicious persona. Our results expose fundamental limitations in alignment of LLMs and bring to the forefront the need to devise reliable mechanisms for ensuring AI safety.
Forward citations
Cited by 6 Pith papers
-
The Behavioral Credibility Trilemma: When Calibrated Autonomy Becomes Impossible
No confidence-gated RL policy can achieve maximum helpfulness, optimal calibration, and full autonomy under rational oversight when tasks exceed the agent's competence, because non-affine autonomy incentives destroy s...
-
Aligned but Blind: Alignment Increases Implicit Bias by Reducing Awareness of Race
Alignment on Llama 3 reduces explicit bias but amplifies implicit bias, because aligned models no longer represent 'black' and 'white' as racial concepts in ambiguous contexts.
-
Test-Time Scaling via Error Localization
TTEL uses feedback-induced token probability drops to localize the first error in a failed reasoning trace and branch a new generation from that prefix, improving pass@k per token on coding and math benchmarks.
-
JADES: A Universal Framework for Jailbreak Assessment via Decompositional Scoring
JADES judges jailbreak success by decomposing harmful prompts into weighted sub-questions and scoring each part, claiming 98.5% human agreement and showing prior attack success rates are inflated.
-
JavelinGuard: Low-Cost Transformer Architectures for LLM Security
A study of five small transformer classifier architectures for LLM jailbreak and prompt injection detection claims low-latency accuracy comparable to large models, led by the multi-task Raudra design.
-
Hyperbolic Deep Learning for Foundation Models: A Survey
A structured survey of hyperbolic-geometry methods for foundation models, concluding the approach is promising but showing limited independent evidence at scale.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.