Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Self-Evaluation Guided Beam Search for Reasoning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.00633 v3 pith:WA5LH6OY submitted 2023-05-01 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords reasoningsearchself-evaluationbeamguidancemulti-stepresultsspace
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Breaking down a problem into intermediate steps has demonstrated impressive performance in Large Language Model (LLM) reasoning. However, the growth of the reasoning chain introduces uncertainty and error accumulation, making it challenging to elicit accurate final results. To tackle this challenge of uncertainty in multi-step reasoning, we introduce a stepwise self-evaluation mechanism to guide and calibrate the reasoning process of LLMs. We propose a decoding algorithm integrating the self-evaluation guidance via stochastic beam search. The self-evaluation guidance serves as a better-calibrated automatic criterion, facilitating an efficient search in the reasoning space and resulting in superior prediction quality. Stochastic beam search balances exploitation and exploration of the search space with temperature-controlled randomness. Our approach surpasses the corresponding Codex-backboned baselines in few-shot accuracy by $6.34\%$, $9.56\%$, and $5.46\%$ on the GSM8K, AQuA, and StrategyQA benchmarks, respectively. Experiment results with Llama-2 on arithmetic reasoning demonstrate the efficiency of our method in outperforming the baseline methods with comparable computational budgets. Further analysis in multi-step reasoning finds our self-evaluation guidance pinpoints logic failures and leads to higher consistency and robustness. Our code is publicly available at https://guideddecoding.github.io/.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Multi-Turn On-Policy Distillation with Prefix Replay

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ReOPD offline-distills multi-turn agentic LLMs via teacher-prefix replay plus step-decay sampling, matching online OPD accuracy at ≥4× speed with zero tool calls.

  2. ZoomEye: Enhancing Multimodal LLMs with Human-Like Zooming Capabilities through Tree-Based Image Exploration

    cs.CV 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ZoomEye uses tree-based zooming, guided by an MLLM's own confidence scores, to improve high-resolution visual question answering without retraining the model.

  3. Physics Reasoner: Knowledge-Augmented Reasoning for Solving Physics Problems with Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A knowledge-augmented framework using a physics formula set and checklists improves LLM accuracy on physics problem benchmarks.

  4. Recursive Decomposition of Logical Thoughts: Framework for Superior Reasoning and Knowledge Propagation in Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-01 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A prompting framework that recursively decomposes reasoning tasks and self-scores candidate thoughts is reported to improve LLM accuracy on math and letter-concatenation benchmarks, though the headline improvement is ...

  5. Towards Intrinsic Self-Correction Enhancement in Monte Carlo Tree Search Boosted Reasoning via Iterative Preference Learning

    cs.LG 2024-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Adding a self-correction RL stage before MCTS-DPO improves arithmetic reasoning accuracy by 2.00 to 4.94 points on GSM8K and MATH.

Pith tools