Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Large Linguistic Models: Investigating LLMs' metalinguistic abilities

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.00948 v4 pith:75G4KCUC submitted 2023-05-01 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords modelsllmstaskslanguagemetalinguisticabilitieslargelinguistic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The performance of large language models (LLMs) has recently improved to the point where models can perform well on many language tasks. We show here that--for the first time--the models can also generate valid metalinguistic analyses of language data. We outline a research program where the behavioral interpretability of LLMs on these tasks is tested via prompting. LLMs are trained primarily on text--as such, evaluating their metalinguistic abilities improves our understanding of their general capabilities and sheds new light on theoretical models in linguistics. We show that OpenAI's (2024) o1 vastly outperforms other models on tasks involving drawing syntactic trees and phonological generalization. We speculate that OpenAI o1's unique advantage over other models may result from the model's chain-of-thought mechanism, which mimics the structure of human reasoning used in complex cognitive tasks, such as linguistic analysis.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 11 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Length Representations in Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Output length in LLMs is encoded in early attention-layer units, and scaling those units changes generated summary length while largely preserving content.

  2. Can LLMs Help Create Grammar?: Automating Grammar Creation for Endangered Languages with In-Context Learning

    cs.CL 2024-12 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    With only a dictionary and parallel sentences, GPT-4o-mini generated XLE grammar rules and mostly accurate lexical entries for Moklen, though the evaluation is not independently verified.

Pith tools