Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Plan, Eliminate, and Track -- Language Models are Good Teachers for Embodied Agents

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.02412 v2 pith:OYO2KWDC submitted 2023-05-03 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords eliminatemoduleplantrackactionagentcontrolfine-tuning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Pre-trained large language models (LLMs) capture procedural knowledge about the world. Recent work has leveraged LLM's ability to generate abstract plans to simplify challenging control tasks, either by action scoring, or action modeling (fine-tuning). However, the transformer architecture inherits several constraints that make it difficult for the LLM to directly serve as the agent: e.g. limited input lengths, fine-tuning inefficiency, bias from pre-training, and incompatibility with non-text environments. To maintain compatibility with a low-level trainable actor, we propose to instead use the knowledge in LLMs to simplify the control problem, rather than solving it. We propose the Plan, Eliminate, and Track (PET) framework. The Plan module translates a task description into a list of high-level sub-tasks. The Eliminate module masks out irrelevant objects and receptacles from the observation for the current sub-task. Finally, the Track module determines whether the agent has accomplished each sub-task. On the AlfWorld instruction following benchmark, the PET framework leads to a significant 15% improvement over SOTA for generalization to human goal specifications.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. FORGE: Research-Trajectory Hijacking Attacks on Deep Research Agents

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    FORGE poisons deep-research planning with coordinated fake reasoning documents, reaching 26.4% PRISM report contamination at five injections; Root Query Anchoring halves that severity.

  2. A Multi-Agent Framework for Zero-Dimensional Reduced-Order Model Planning

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A multi-agent LLM framework with ontology RAG and MILP-guided search automates forward and inverse 0D reduced-order network design across aero-engine air systems, power grids, and water networks.

  3. DrafterBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Tasks Automation in Civil Engineering

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    DrafterBench is a new benchmark of 1,920 PDF drawing-revision tasks; on it, the best model (OpenAI o1) averages about 80/100, and all tested models fail hard on incomplete instructions and plan execution.

  4. Brain-inspired AI Agent: The Way Towards AGI

    cs.NE 2024-12 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper proposes a brain-inspired agent architecture built from cortical-region modules and functional connectivity networks as a conceptual route to AGI, without empirical validation.

Pith tools