REVIEW 3 cited by
Lift Yourself Up: Retrieval-augmented Text Generation with Self Memory
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
With direct access to human-written reference as memory, retrieval-augmented generation has achieved much progress in a wide range of text generation tasks. Since better memory would typically prompt better generation~(we define this as primal problem). The traditional approach for memory retrieval involves selecting memory that exhibits the highest similarity to the input. However, this method is constrained by the quality of the fixed corpus from which memory is retrieved. In this paper, by exploring the duality of the primal problem: better generation also prompts better memory, we propose a novel framework, selfmem, which addresses this limitation by iteratively employing a retrieval-augmented generator to create an unbounded memory pool and using a memory selector to choose one output as memory for the subsequent generation round. This enables the model to leverage its own output, referred to as self-memory, for improved generation. We evaluate the effectiveness of selfmem on three distinct text generation tasks: neural machine translation, abstractive text summarization, and dialogue generation, under two generation paradigms: fine-tuned small model and few-shot LLM. Our approach achieves state-of-the-art results in four directions in JRC-Acquis, XSum (50.3 ROUGE-1), and BigPatent (62.9 ROUGE-1), demonstrating the potential of self-memory in enhancing retrieval-augmented generation models. Furthermore, we conduct thorough analyses of each component in the selfmem framework to identify bottlenecks and provide insights for future research.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
EvoWiki: Evaluating LLMs on Evolving Knowledge
EvoWiki categorizes facts as stable, evolved, or uncharted and shows that LLMs perform much worse on evolved and uncharted knowledge, with RAG plus continual learning providing the best adaptation.
-
Diverse And Private Synthetic Datasets Generation for RAG evaluation: A multi-agent framework
A multi-agent LLM framework generates synthetic QA datasets for RAG evaluation by combining clustering-based sampling, PII pseudonymization, and QA curation, with reported diversity gains and 0.75-0.90 masking accuracy.
-
A Survey on Large Language Models with some Insights on their Capabilities and Limitations
A broad survey of LLM methods and applications, plus an empirical section on how code-rich pretraining may influence chain-of-thought reasoning, the details of which are not visible in the supplied text.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.