Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

AI-assisted Code Authoring at Scale: Fine-tuning, deploying, and mixed methods evaluation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.12050 v2 pith:CKWJMOVN submitted 2023-05-20 cs.SE cs.AI

classification cs.SEcs.AI
keywords codecodecomposeauthoringdevelopersfeedbackmetamodelai-assisted
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Generative LLMs have been shown to effectively power AI-based code authoring tools that can suggest entire statements or blocks of code during code authoring. In this paper we present CodeCompose, an AI-assisted code authoring tool developed and deployed at Meta internally. CodeCompose is based on the InCoder LLM that merges generative capabilities with bi-directionality. We have scaled up CodeCompose to serve tens of thousands of developers at Meta, across 9 programming languages and several coding surfaces. We present our experience in making design decisions about the model and system architecture for CodeCompose that addresses these challenges. To release a LLM model at this scale, we needed to first ensure that it is sufficiently accurate. In a random sample of 20K source code files, depending on the language, we are able to reproduce hidden lines between 40% and 58% of the time, an improvement of 1.4x and 4.1x over a model trained only on public data. We gradually rolled CodeCompose out to developers. At the time of this writing, 16K developers have used it with 8% of their code coming directly from CodeCompose. To triangulate our numerical findings, we conduct a thematic analysis on the feedback from 70 developers. We find that 91.5% of the feedback is positive, with the most common themes being discovering APIs, dealing with boilerplate code, and accelerating coding. Meta continues to integrate this feedback into CodeCompose.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Harden and Catch for Just-in-Time Assured LLM-Based Software Testing: Open Research Challenges

    cs.SE 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    This paper formally defines hardening and catching tests, introduces the Catching Just-in-Time Test (JiTTest) Challenge for LLM-generated software tests, and argues it is the most impactful open problem in automated t...

  2. On the Adversarial Robustness of Instruction-Tuned Large Language Models for Code

    cs.SE 2024-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Appending LLM-generated misleading code snippets to coding prompts lowers pass@1 by 12-34% for open-source and 3-24% for commercial code LLMs; guided prompting restores only part of the loss.

  3. Adaptive Request Scheduling for CodeLLM Serving with SLA Guarantees

    cs.SE 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    SABER uses a fitted scalability curve and deadline-aware admission control to dynamically size continuous batches, improving SLA-compliant throughput by up to 26% over the best static configuration.

  4. The Hitchhikers Guide to Production-ready Trustworthy Foundation Model powered Software (FMware)

    cs.SE 2025-05 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    The paper catalogs the lifecycle stages and production-readiness challenges of software built around foundation models (FMware) and proposes an action plan of engineering practices and research directions.

Pith tools