REVIEW 3 cited by
Don't Trust ChatGPT when Your Question is not in English: A Study of Multilingual Abilities and Types of LLMs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional natural language understanding abilities and have excelled in a variety of natural language processing (NLP)tasks in recent years. Despite the fact that most LLMs are trained predominantly in English, multiple studies have demonstrated their comparative performance in many other languages. However, fundamental questions persist regarding how LLMs acquire their multi-lingual abilities and how performance varies across different languages. These inquiries are crucial for the study of LLMs since users and researchers often come from diverse language backgrounds, potentially influencing their utilization and interpretation of LLMs' results. In this work, we propose a systematic way of qualifying the performance disparities of LLMs under multilingual settings. We investigate the phenomenon of across-language generalizations in LLMs, wherein insufficient multi-lingual training data leads to advanced multi-lingual capabilities. To accomplish this, we employ a novel back-translation-based prompting method. The results show that GPT exhibits highly translating-like behaviour in multilingual settings.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Evaluating Chinese Large Language Models: The Influence of Persona Assignment on Stereotypes and Safeguards
Assigning personas to Chinese LLMs amplifies toxic output relative to default behavior, while refusal rates shift systematically with persona gender and target social group.
-
CausalAbstain: Enhancing Multilingual LLMs with Causal Reasoning for Trustworthy Abstention
CausalAbstain filters multilingual self-feedback by comparing how much it changes the model's abstention decision, improving abstention accuracy over baselines on two benchmarks.
-
A Qualitative Investigation into LLM-Generated Multilingual Code Comments and Automatic Evaluation Metrics
Neural metrics for evaluating code comments are unreliable for multilingual output, often scoring random noise as high as real generated comments.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.