Pith. sign in

REVIEW 13 cited by

DES Y3 + KiDS-1000: Consistent cosmology combining cosmic shear surveys

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.17173 v2 pith:DZZNFX3E submitted 2023-05-26 astro-ph.CO

Dark Energy Survey , Kilo-Degree Survey Collaboration: T. M. C. Abbott , M. Aguena , A. Alarcon , O. Alves , A. Amon , F. Andrade-Oliveira , M. Asgari
show 153 more authors
S. Avila D. Bacon K. Bechtol M. R. Becker G. M. Bernstein E. Bertin M. Bilicki J. Blazek S. Bocquet D. Brooks P. Burger D. L. Burke H. Camacho A. Campos A. Carnero Rosell M. Carrasco Kind J. Carretero F. J. Castander R. Cawthon C. Chang R. Chen A. Choi C. Conselice J. Cordero M. Crocce L. N. da Costa M. E. da Silva Pereira R. Dalal C. Davis J. T. A. de Jong J. DeRose S. Desai H. T. Diehl S. Dodelson P. Doel C. Doux A. Drlica-Wagner A. Dvornik K. Eckert T. F. Eifler J. Elvin-Poole S. Everett X. Fang I. Ferrero A. Ferté B. Flaugher O. Friedrich J. Frieman J. García-Bellido M. Gatti G. Giannini B. Giblin D. Gruen R. A. Gruendl G. Gutierrez I. Harrison W. G. Hartley K. Herner C. Heymans H. Hildebrandt S. R. Hinton H. Hoekstra D. L. Hollowood K. Honscheid H. Huang E. M. Huff D. Huterer D. J. James M. Jarvis N. Jeffrey T. Jeltema B. Joachimi S. Joudaki A. Kannawadi E. Krause K. Kuehn K. Kuijken N. Kuropatkin O. Lahav P.-F. Leget P. Lemos S.-S. Li X. Li A. R. Liddle M. Lima C.-A Lin H. Lin N. MacCrann C. Mahony J. L. Marshall J. McCullough J. Mena-Fernández F. Menanteau R. Miquel J. J. Mohr J. Muir J. Myles N. Napolitano A. Navarro-Alsina R. L. C. Ogando A. Palmese S. Pandey Y. Park M. Paterno J. A. Peacock D. Petravick A. Pieres A. A. Plazas Malagón A. Porredon J. Prat M. Radovich M. Raveri R. Reischke N. C. Robertson R. P. Rollins A. K. Romer A. Roodman E. S. Rykoff S. Samuroff C. Sánchez E. Sanchez J. Sanchez P. Schneider L. F. Secco I. Sevilla-Noarbe H.-Y. Shan E. Sheldon T. Shin C. Sifón M. Smith M. Soares-Santos B. Stölzner E. Suchyta M. E. C. Swanson G. Tarle D. Thomas C. To M. A. Troxel T. Tröster I. Tutusaus J. L. van den Busch T. N. Varga A. R. Walker N. Weaverdyck R. H. Wechsler J. Weller P. Wiseman A. H. Wright B. Yanny B. Yin M. Yoon Y. Zhang J. Zuntz
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.CO
keywords surveyanalysisconsistentcosmickids-1000parameterconstraintsmarginal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We present a joint cosmic shear analysis of the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y3) and the Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS-1000) in a collaborative effort between the two survey teams. We find consistent cosmological parameter constraints between DES Y3 and KiDS-1000 which, when combined in a joint-survey analysis, constrain the parameter $S_8 = \sigma_8 \sqrt{\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3}$ with a mean value of $0.790^{+0.018}_{-0.014}$. The mean marginal is lower than the maximum a posteriori estimate, $S_8=0.801$, owing to skewness in the marginal distribution and projection effects in the multi-dimensional parameter space. Our results are consistent with $S_8$ constraints from observations of the cosmic microwave background by Planck, with agreement at the $1.7\sigma$ level. We use a Hybrid analysis pipeline, defined from a mock survey study quantifying the impact of the different analysis choices originally adopted by each survey team. We review intrinsic alignment models, baryon feedback mitigation strategies, priors, samplers and models of the non-linear matter power spectrum.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 13 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 151 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. General Relativistic Entropic Acceleration at the perturbation level: a CLASS implementation and first Boltzmann-code constraints

    gr-qc 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    First full Boltzmann-code implementation of entropic dark energy, with MCMC constraints from CMB+BAO+SN, yields α≈1 and a fit statistically indistinguishable from ΛCDM.

  2. What's Missing in AGN Feedback? Lessons learnt from Magneticum, IllustrisTNG and Simba

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    No current simulation simultaneously reproduces observed halo hot-gas fractions and local galaxy star-formation/quenching demographics; strong AGN feedback overquenches, weak feedback retains too much gas.

  3. A sound horizon independent measurement of $H_0$ from BOSS, DESI and DES Y3

    astro-ph.CO 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Combining BOSS power spectrum and bispectrum with DESI and DES lensing data yields a sound-horizon-free H0 = 70.2 ± 2.3 km/s/Mpc, with a 1.8σ BAO scale deviation that is scale-cut dependent.

  4. Cosmic Shear constraints from HSC Year 3 with clustering calibration of the tomographic redshift distributions from DESI

    astro-ph.CO 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Reanalysis of HSC Y3 cosmic shear with DESI clustering redshift calibration yields S8 = 0.805 ± 0.018, a 1.8× error reduction and upward shift toward Planck cosmology.

  5. $S_8$ from peculiar velocities: agreement with Planck for Tully--Fisher and supernovae, tension for the fundamental plane

    astro-ph.CO 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A unified Bayesian analysis of Tully-Fisher, fundamental plane, and supernova distances gives S8 = 0.819±0.030, consistent with the Planck CMB value of 0.832±0.013.

  6. Rapid late-time reionization: constraints and cosmological implications

    astro-ph.CO 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Reionization is inferred to be rapid and late (midpoint z≈7, duration Δz50≈1.1), yielding an optical depth τ=0.0492 from Lyman-alpha + BAO + BBN, independent of CMB data.

  7. Cosmology from Planck CMB Lensing and DESI DR1 Quasar Tomography

    astro-ph.CO 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    DESI DR1 quasars cross-correlated with Planck PR4 lensing give sigma8 = 0.929 and S8 = 0.922, about 1.5 sigma above Planck's LCDM prediction, and a sound-horizon-free H0 = 69.1 km/s/Mpc.

  8. Lensing Without Borders: Measurements of galaxy-galaxy lensing and projected galaxy clustering in DESI DR1

    astro-ph.CO 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    DESI DR1 galaxy-galaxy lensing measurements are consistent across four source surveys once HSC galaxy redshift distributions are shifted, supporting their use in cosmological analyses.

  9. Background-level reconstruction of scalar-field potentials from dark-energy histories and comparison with analytic potential families

    astro-ph.CO 2026-03 conditional novelty 5.5 of 10

    A background reconstruction maps prescribed ρ_de(z) histories to V(φ) and ranks analytic potentials by Bayesian evidence, with exponential preferred for CPL and shifted-tanh for sign-switching targets.

  10. Synergy between the gravitational potential decay rate and other structure growth probes in testing gravity

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Tomographic DR data added to Σ8 + fσ8 tightens phenomenological MG parameters (μ0, Σ0, η0) and EFT α coefficients by factors of 1.5–2.

  11. Observational constraints on early time non-phantom behaviour of dynamical dark energy

    astro-ph.CO 2025-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Early scaling dark energy is constrained to be less than about one percent at matter-radiation equality and is disfavored by model selection, while late-time CPL dynamics show only a weak preference away from ΛCDM.

  12. Is $\omega_0 \omega_a$CDM a good model for the clumpy Universe?

    astro-ph.CO 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Against a Gaussian-process reconstruction of 15 sigma8(z) measurements, the DESI w0waCDM model fits slightly better than LambdaCDM, but the difference is tiny and the comparison metric is biased.

  13. Dark Matter Constraints from Small-Scale Cosmic Structure

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 accept novelty 2.0 of 10

    A comprehensive review maps frontier small-scale structure probes onto warm, fuzzy, interacting, self-interacting, and decaying dark-matter limits and flags probe combination as the path forward.

Pith tools