Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 4 cited by

A density history of dark energy can be turned into the scalar potential needed to produce it, and standard potential shapes can then be ranked by how well they match.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-15 12:00 UTC pith:4DIXSH6L

load-bearing objection Clean background dictionary from ρ_de(z) to V(φ) with NEC single-field check; Stage-2 rankings are useful but baseline-dependent. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2603.14693 v2 pith:4DIXSH6L submitted 2026-03-16 astro-ph.CO

Background-level reconstruction of scalar-field potentials from dark-energy histories and comparison with analytic potential families

Shahnawaz A. Adil , Miguel A. Zapata , \"Ozg\"ur Akarsu , J. Alberto Vazquez This is my paper
classification astro-ph.CO
keywords dark energyscalar field reconstructionnull energy conditionCPL parametrizationsign-switching densityBayesian model comparisonpotential spaceFLRW cosmology
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper builds a background-only map that starts from a chosen late-time dark-energy density history and reconstructs the pressure, kinetic term, field trajectory, and potential of an effective scalar field. The map is written directly in terms of density and its redshift derivative, so it stays well defined even when density crosses zero and the usual equation-of-state ratio becomes meaningless. The sign of the null-energy combination then decides whether a single real scalar with fixed kinetic signature can realize the whole history. Applied to three benchmarks (CPL, a sign-switching tanh profile, and a positive-definite emergent tanh profile), the method shows that CPL crosses the null-energy boundary and must be read as an effective description of a larger sector, while both tanh histories stay on a consistent phantom branch. Treating each reconstructed potential as a target, the authors then compare common analytic potential families by Bayesian evidence in field space and obtain a concrete ranking: exponential is preferred for the restricted CPL branch, while the shifted-tanh form is strongly preferred for the sign-switching target.

Core claim

A prescribed dark-energy density history ρ_de(z) can be mapped, at the homogeneous background level, onto an effective scalar trajectory φ(z) and potential V(φ), with the null-energy combination serving as the single-field consistency check; Bayesian comparison of the reconstructed targets against standard analytic families then ranks which potential shapes best reproduce each history.

What carries the argument

The NEC identity ρ_de + p_de = (1+z)/3 dρ_de/dz, which both reconstructs the kinetic term and selects the admissible kinetic signature ε = ±1 (or shows that no single fixed-ε field can work).

Load-bearing premise

The ranking of potentials rests on mock data drawn from the reconstructed target under a fixed, ad-hoc noise model and broad priors, so the evidence scores are conditional on that baseline rather than on real cosmological measurements.

What would settle it

Reconstruct V_tar(φ) from an independent, observationally preferred ρ_de(z) (or from a fully data-driven expansion history) under a different noise model or prior volume and check whether the same potential families still win the evidence ranking for the same benchmarks.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Phenomenological expansion histories can be translated into concrete field-space shapes without first writing a fundamental scalar model.
  • Histories that cross the null-energy boundary (such as the CPL phantom divide with positive density) cannot be realized by a single fixed-signature real scalar and must be completed by multi-field or non-canonical sectors.
  • Smooth AdS-to-dS or emergent transition histories select a phantom-branch realization whose reconstructed potential is best matched by a shifted-tanh form among the families tested.
  • The same dictionary can be re-run on future high-precision expansion data to update which analytic potentials remain viable at the background level.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Once the map is available, one can ask which minimal multi-field completion reproduces a multivalued CPL-like target with the fewest extra degrees of freedom.
  • A fully non-parametric reconstruction of ρ_de(z) from forthcoming surveys would turn the method into a data-driven filter on the space of late-time potentials rather than a benchmark exercise.
  • The strong preference for the shifted-tanh potential under sign-switching targets suggests that smooth plateau-to-plateau templates are the natural analytic language for AdS-to-dS-like backgrounds.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a background-level reconstruction that maps a prescribed dark-energy density history ρ_de(z) in flat FLRW to an effective scalar-field description: pressure p_de, kinetic term K, trajectory φ(z), and potential V(φ), with the NEC combination ρ_de + p_de as the single-field consistency diagnostic. Three benchmarks are treated: CPL (which crosses the NEC boundary and yields a multivalued V(φ)), a sign-switching tanh (mirror AdS o dS) profile, and a positive-definite shifted-tanh emergent profile. For the latter two, the reconstruction selects a consistent phantom branch (ε = −1). Treating the reconstructed V_tar(φ) as a target, the authors then rank six analytic potential families by Bayesian evidence on mock potential-space data. For the restricted CPL phantom branch the exponential is nominally preferred (with shifted-tanh and hilltop competitive); for the tanh target the shifted-tanh potential is strongly preferred.

Significance. If the reconstruction and ranking hold as stated, the work supplies a clean, reusable dictionary between phenomenological ρ_de(z) histories (including sign-changing ones) and the scalar potentials needed to realize them at the homogeneous level. The NEC-based single-field consistency check and the explicit handling of multivalued CPL are useful diagnostics for the DESI-era discussion of dynamical and sign-switching dark energy. The potential-space Bayesian filter is a controlled theory-space ranking rather than a new cosmological fit; its value is as a practical map from expansion histories to preferred potential shapes, with clear caveats on the noise model.

major comments (2)
  1. Section IV C–D and Table III: the Stage-2 ranking is performed on mock data drawn from V_tar with fixed ad-hoc noise (σ_rel = 0.1, σ_abs = 0.05) and the priors of Table II. Absolute log Z and the close CPL ranking (exponential 165.23 vs shifted-tanh 165.10 vs hilltop 165.05) are therefore baseline-dependent. The manuscript already scopes this as a theory-space filter, but a short sensitivity check (e.g. varying σ_rel/σ_abs by a factor of two, or a leave-one-prior-bound test) would make the competitive CPL subset and the decisive tanh preference more robust before publication.
  2. Section V B.1 and Fig. 2: for CPL the potential-space comparison is restricted to the single-valued p-phantom branch. The abstract and conclusions correctly note this restriction, but the main text should state more explicitly which redshift (or φ) interval is retained and whether the ranking is stable under modest changes of that cut, so that the claim “exponential has the highest evidence” is not read as applying to the full multivalued history.
minor comments (4)
  1. Appendix A / Fig. 11: the Klein–Gordon residual for CPL shows a localized deviation at the NEC crossing, as expected; a one-sentence quantification of the residual amplitude on the retained phantom branch would strengthen the consistency claim for the branch that is actually used in the Bayesian comparison.
  2. Table I and surrounding text: the p/n-quintessence and p/n-phantom taxonomy is clear; a brief cross-reference when discussing the tanh zero-crossing (Fig. 3) would help readers who skip the table.
  3. Figs. 7 and 9: residual panels are useful; ensuring consistent vertical scales across the six sub-panels would make visual comparison of fit quality easier.
  4. Section IV A footnote: the fixed benchmark parameters (w0, wa, z†, η, etc.) are taken from the literature; stating the precise references next to each numerical choice would improve reproducibility.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Reconstruction from prescribed ρ_de(z) is non-circular; Stage-2 evidence ranking is only a controlled functional match to mock data drawn from the same V_tar under ad-hoc noise, which the paper itself scopes correctly.

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Sec. IV C (Stage 2) and Table III]
    "From the reconstructed target V_tar(φ) we construct mock potential-space data points {(φ_i, V_i^(mock))} by sampling φ_i throughout the reconstructed field range and drawing V_i^(mock)=V_tar(φ_i)+δV_i with Gaussian scatter δV_i∼N(0,σ_i^{2}), where σ_i^{2}=(σ_rel|V_tar(φ_i)|)^{2}+σ_abs^{2}. We then fit each analytic candidate … and rank models by the Bayesian evidence log Z_M … We emphasize that this evidence ranking quantifies agreement with the reconstructed target in field space under the adopted noise model, rather than a direct fit to cosmological observations."

    The evidences (and the absolute log-Z values reported in Table III) are obtained by fitting templates to synthetic data that are generated from the identical V_tar being ranked, under an author-chosen noise model and prior volume. Absolute ranking and close separations (e.g. exponential vs shifted-tanh vs hilltop for the restricted CPL branch) are therefore forced by that baseline; only relative functional similarity is informative. The paper itself flags the conditionality, so the circularity is mild and scoped.

full rationale

The load-bearing Stage-1 map (Eqs. 16–28, sign-consistency condition 24) is the standard continuity + kinetic identity applied to a user-prescribed ρ_de(z); V(φ) and the NEC diagnosis of CPL multivaluedness versus single-field phantom viability for the tanh histories follow directly and are not defined in terms of the later ranking. Stage-2 constructs mock potential-space data from that same V_tar under fixed σ_rel=0.1, σ_abs=0.05 and the priors of Table II, then ranks analytic templates by nested-sampling evidence. Absolute log Z and the close CPL competition are therefore baseline-dependent by construction of the noise/prior setup, but the paper repeatedly states that the ranking is only a theory-space filter conditional on that setup, not a cosmological prediction. No self-definitional loop, no uniqueness theorem imported from the authors, and no ansatz smuggled in as a derivation appear. Self-citations to prior ΛsCDM work supply motivation for the benchmark histories, not the reconstruction equations. Score 2 reflects only the mild, already-acknowledged baseline dependence of Stage-2; the central dictionary claim remains independent.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

Central claims rest on standard FLRW GR plus a prescribed phenomenological ρ_de(z), fixed background parameters, an effective single-field (or effective 1D) mapping, and an ad-hoc Gaussian noise model for potential-space evidence. No new particles or forces are introduced; free parameters are the usual DE and potential-template parameters plus the mock-noise scales.

free parameters (5)
  • CPL (w0, wa) = w0=-0.838, wa=-0.62
    Benchmark equation-of-state parameters fixed to literature values (w0=-0.838, wa=-0.62) that set the CPL density history and thus V_tar.
  • tanh transition (z†, η) = z†=1.8, η=5
    Transition redshift and sharpness fixed by hand from literature (z†=1.8, η=5), controlling the sign-switch/emergent profiles.
  • Background cosmology (h, Ωm, TCMB, Neff) = h=0.7, Ωm=0.31, TCMB=2.7255 K, Neff=3.046
    Fixed to standard values to build E(z); not fitted here but required for the reconstruction.
  • Potential-space noise (σ_rel, σ_abs) = σ_rel=0.1, σ_abs=0.05
    Ad-hoc Gaussian scatter used to build mock V data for Bayesian evidence; directly affects absolute log Z.
  • Analytic potential parameters θ
    Amplitudes, slopes, centers, widths, etc., of exponential/PNGB/hilltop/IPL/Gaussian/shifted-tanh families, sampled under Table II priors.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Spatially flat FLRW GR with separately conserved components; Friedmann and continuity equations hold.
    Section II; standard cosmology background for the whole reconstruction.
  • domain assumption Effective homogeneous minimally coupled scalar with fixed kinetic signature ε=±1 maps to DE via ρ+p=ε φ̇² when the NEC sign is constant.
    Section III; single-field consistency condition Eq. (24).
  • domain assumption When NEC boundary is crossed, the reconstruction is only an effective 1D projection of an extended sector (e.g. quintom).
    Stated for CPL in abstract and Sec. III–V; not derived from a specific multi-field model.
  • ad hoc to paper Mock Gaussian noise in potential space with fixed relative/absolute σ is an adequate likelihood for ranking analytic V(φ).
    Section IV C; not calibrated to cosmological data.
  • ad hoc to paper Weakly informative priors of Table II do not drive the evidence ranking.
    Section IV D; authors claim posteriors are data-driven but absolute Z depends on prior volume.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 49219 in / 3539 out tokens · 25972 ms · 2026-07-15T12:00:08.005963+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We present a unified \emph{background-level} framework that maps a prescribed late-time dark-energy density history $\rho_{\rm de}(z)$ onto an effective scalar-field description in a spatially flat FLRW universe. Working directly with $\rho_{\rm de}(z)$, we reconstruct the associated field trajectory $\phi(z)$, and field-space potential $V(\phi)$, together with a null energy condition (NEC) consistency check. We apply the method to three benchmark histories: (i) the Chevallier--Polarski--Linder (CPL) form; (ii) a smooth mirror AdS$\rightarrow$dS sign-switching profile in which $\rho_{\rm de}$ crosses zero at $z_\dagger$, interpolating between a positive late-time plateau and a negative high-$z$ plateau ($\Lambda_{\rm s}$CDM-like at the background level); and (iii) a shifted-$\tanh$ emergent profile that remains positive definite and approaches $\rho_{\rm de}\to 0^{+}$ at high redshift. Finally, treating the reconstructed potential, $V_{\rm tar}(\phi)$, as a target, we perform Bayesian model comparison directly in \emph{potential space} and rank representative analytic potential families by their Bayesian evidence. For CPL (restricting to the single-valued phantom branch for the potential-space comparison), the exponential potential has the highest evidence in the baseline analysis, while the shifted-$\tanh$ and hilltop quartic forms remain close competitors; for the sign-switching $\tanh$ target, the shifted-$\tanh$ potential is strongly preferred, and the emergent profile yields the same qualitative ranking. These results provide a practical dictionary between phenomenological expansion histories and the scalar-field potential shapes required to reproduce them at the background level.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A Friendly Phantom: Late-time AdS-to-dS transition and cosmological tensions

    gr-qc 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Ph-Λ_sCDM realizes sign-switching dark energy via a phantom scalar on a tanh potential, enabling controlled AdS-to-dS transition without Big Rip.

  2. Negative neutrino mass or negative dark energy?

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A sign-switching dark energy model (Λ_s CDM) recovers positive effective neutrino masses (0.055 ± 0.050 eV) consistent with oscillation data, unlike ΛCDM which prefers negative values (-0.075 eV), for DESI DR2 + CMB +...

  3. Do equation of state parametrizations of dark energy faithfully capture the dynamics of the late universe?

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Node-based reconstruction of cosmic expansion prefers stronger deceleration at z≈1.7 than smooth DE EoS parametrizations, isolating z~1.5-2 as a window where the latter may compress localized kinematic features permit...

  4. Dark Energy in the DESI Era: A Brief Review of Evidence, Beyond-$\Lambda$CDM Interpretations, and Tensions

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 1.0

    Review of DESI evidence for dynamical dark energy, its dependence on parametrization and datasets, and alternative beyond-LambdaCDM interpretations that may address cosmological tensions.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

261 extracted references · 220 linked inside Pith · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Aghanimet al.(Planck), Planck 2018 results

    N. Aghanimet al.(Planck), Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys.641, A6 (2020), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], 1807.06209

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  2. [2]

    S. Alamet al.(eBOSS), Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Cosmological implications from two decades of spectroscopic surveys at the Apache Point Observatory, Phys. Rev. D103, 083533 (2021), 2007.08991

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  3. [3]

    Scolnicet al., The Pantheon+ Analysis: The Full Data Set and Light-curve Release, Astrophys

    D. Scolnicet al., The Pantheon+ Analysis: The Full Data Set and Light-curve Release, Astrophys. J.938, 113 (2022), 2112.03863

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  4. [4]

    Broutet al., The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints, Astrophys

    D. Broutet al., The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints, Astrophys. J.938, 110 (2022), 2202.04077

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  5. [5]

    Rubinet al., Union Through UNITY: Cosmology with 2,000 SNe Using a Unified Bayesian Framework, Astrophys

    D. Rubinet al., Union Through UNITY: Cosmology with 2,000 SNe Using a Unified Bayesian Framework, Astrophys. J.986, 231 (2025), 2311.12098

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    A. G. Adameet al.(DESI), DESI 2024 VI: cosmological constraints from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations, JCAP02, 021, 2404.03002

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Louiset al.(Atacama Cosmology Telescope), The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 power spectra, likelihoods and ΛCDM parameters, JCAP11, 062, 2503.14452

    T. Louiset al.(Atacama Cosmology Telescope), The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 power spectra, likelihoods and ΛCDM parameters, JCAP11, 062, 2503.14452

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  8. [8]

    Abdul Karimet al.(DESI), DESI DR2 results

    M. Abdul Karimet al.(DESI), DESI DR2 results. II. Measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations and cos- mological constraints, Phys. Rev. D112, 083515 (2025), 2503.14738

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    Camphuiset al.(SPT-3G), SPT-3G D1: CMB tem- perature and polarization power spectra and cosmology from 2019 and 2020 observations of the SPT-3G Main field (2025), 2506.20707

    E. Camphuiset al.(SPT-3G), SPT-3G D1: CMB tem- perature and polarization power spectra and cosmology from 2019 and 2020 observations of the SPT-3G Main field (2025), 2506.20707

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  10. [10]

    B. Popovicet al.(DES), The Dark Energy Survey Su- pernova Program: A Reanalysis Of Cosmology Re- sults And Evidence For Evolving Dark Energy With An Updated Type Ia Supernova Calibration (2025), 2511.07517

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  11. [11]

    Weinberg, The Cosmological Constant Problem, Rev

    S. Weinberg, The Cosmological Constant Problem, Rev. Mod. Phys.61, 1 (1989)

    1989

  12. [12]

    Sahni and A

    V. Sahni and A. A. Starobinsky, The Case for a positive cosmological Lambda term, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D9, 373 (2000), astro-ph/9904398

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  13. [13]

    Sahni, The Cosmological constant problem and quintessence, Class

    V. Sahni, The Cosmological constant problem and quintessence, Class. Quant. Grav.19, 3435 (2002), astro-ph/0202076

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  14. [14]

    Verde, T

    L. Verde, T. Treu, and A. G. Riess, Tensions between the Early and the Late Universe, Nature Astron.3, 891 (2019), 1907.10625

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  15. [15]

    Di Valentinoet al., Snowmass2021 - Letter of interest cosmology intertwined II: The hubble constant tension, Astropart

    E. Di Valentinoet al., Snowmass2021 - Letter of interest cosmology intertwined II: The hubble constant tension, Astropart. Phys.131, 102605 (2021), 2008.11284

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  16. [16]

    Di Valentino, O

    E. Di Valentino, O. Mena, S. Pan, L. Visinelli, W. Yang, A. Melchiorri, D. F. Mota, A. G. Riess, and J. Silk, In the realm of the Hubble tension—a review of solutions, Class. Quant. Grav.38, 153001 (2021), 2103.01183

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  17. [17]

    Perivolaropoulos and F

    L. Perivolaropoulos and F. Skara, Challenges for ΛCDM: An update, New Astron. Rev.95, 101659 (2022), 2105.05208

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  18. [18]

    Sch¨ oneberg, G

    N. Sch¨ oneberg, G. Franco Abell´ an, A. P´ erez S´ anchez, S. J. Witte, V. Poulin, and J. Lesgourgues, The H0 Olympics: A fair ranking of proposed models, Phys. Rept.984, 1 (2022), 2107.10291

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  19. [19]

    E. Abdallaet al., Cosmology intertwined: A review of the particle physics, astrophysics, and cosmology asso- ciated with the cosmological tensions and anomalies, JHEAp34, 49 (2022), 2203.06142

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  20. [20]

    Di Valentino, Challenges of the Standard Cosmolog- ical Model, Universe8, 399 (2022)

    E. Di Valentino, Challenges of the Standard Cosmolog- ical Model, Universe8, 399 (2022)

    2022

  21. [21]

    Vagnozzi, Seven Hints That Early-Time New Physics Alone Is Not Sufficient to Solve the Hubble Tension, Universe9, 393 (2023), 2308.16628

    S. Vagnozzi, Seven Hints That Early-Time New Physics Alone Is Not Sufficient to Solve the Hubble Tension, Universe9, 393 (2023), 2308.16628

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  22. [22]

    A. R. Khalife, M. B. Zanjani, S. Galli, S. G¨ unther, J. Lesgourgues, and K. Benabed, Review of Hubble tension solutions with new SH0ES and SPT-3G data, JCAP04, 059, 2312.09814. 23

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  23. [23]

    Akarsu, E

    ¨O. Akarsu, E. ´O. Colg´ ain, A. A. Sen, and M. M. Sheikh- Jabbari, ΛCDM Tensions: Localising Missing Physics through Consistency Checks, Universe10, 305 (2024), 2402.04767

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    Di Valentinoet al.(CosmoVerse Network), The CosmoVerse White Paper: Addressing observational tensions in cosmology with systematics and funda- mental physics, Phys

    E. Di Valentinoet al.(CosmoVerse Network), The CosmoVerse White Paper: Addressing observational tensions in cosmology with systematics and funda- mental physics, Phys. Dark Univ.49, 101965 (2025), 2504.01669

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    A. G. Riesset al., A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km s−1 Mpc−1 Uncertainty from the Hubble Space Tele- scope and the SH0ES Team, Astrophys. J. Lett.934, L7 (2022), 2112.04510

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  26. [26]

    Breuval, A

    L. Breuval, A. G. Riess, S. Casertano, W. Yuan, L. M. Macri, M. Romaniello, Y. S. Murakami, D. Scolnic, G. S. Anand, and I. Soszy´ nski, Small Magellanic Cloud Cepheids Observed with the Hubble Space Telescope Provide a New Anchor for the SH0ES Distance Ladder, Astrophys. J.973, 30 (2024), 2404.08038

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  27. [27]

    Casertanoet al.(H0DN), The Local Distance Net- work: a community consensus report on the measure- ment of the Hubble constant at 1% precision (2025), 2510.23823

    S. Casertanoet al.(H0DN), The Local Distance Net- work: a community consensus report on the measure- ment of the Hubble constant at 1% precision (2025), 2510.23823

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    Di Valentinoet al., Cosmology Intertwined III: f σ8 andS 8, Astropart

    E. Di Valentinoet al., Cosmology Intertwined III: f σ8 andS 8, Astropart. Phys.131, 102604 (2021), 2008.11285

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  29. [29]

    R. C. Nunes and S. Vagnozzi, Arbitrating the S8 dis- crepancy with growth rate measurements from redshift- space distortions, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.505, 5427 (2021), 2106.01208

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  30. [30]

    S. A. Adil, ¨O. Akarsu, M. Malekjani, E. ´O. Colg´ ain, S. Pourojaghi, A. A. Sen, and M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, S8 increases with effective redshift in ΛCDM cosmol- ogy, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.528, L20 (2023), 2303.06928

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  31. [31]

    Akarsu, E

    ¨O. Akarsu, E. ´O. Colg´ ain, A. A. Sen, and M. M. Sheikh- Jabbari, Further support forS 8 increasing with effective redshift, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.542, L36 (2025), 2410.23134

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    D’Amico, J

    G. D’Amico, J. Gleyzes, N. Kokron, K. Markovic, L. Senatore, P. Zhang, F. Beutler, and H. Gil-Mar´ ın, The Cosmological Analysis of the SDSS/BOSS data from the Effective Field Theory of Large-Scale Struc- ture, JCAP05, 005, 1909.05271

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1909

  33. [33]

    Tr¨ osteret al., Cosmology from large-scale structure: Constraining ΛCDM with BOSS, Astron

    T. Tr¨ osteret al., Cosmology from large-scale structure: Constraining ΛCDM with BOSS, Astron. Astrophys. 633, L10 (2020), 1909.11006

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  34. [34]

    Heymanset al., KiDS-1000 Cosmology: Multi-probe weak gravitational lensing and spectroscopic galaxy clustering constraints, Astron

    C. Heymanset al., KiDS-1000 Cosmology: Multi-probe weak gravitational lensing and spectroscopic galaxy clustering constraints, Astron. Astrophys.646, A140 (2021), 2007.15632

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  35. [35]

    Asgariet al.(KiDS), KiDS-1000 Cosmology: Cos- mic shear constraints and comparison between two point statistics, Astron

    M. Asgariet al.(KiDS), KiDS-1000 Cosmology: Cos- mic shear constraints and comparison between two point statistics, Astron. Astrophys.645, A104 (2021), 2007.15633

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  36. [36]

    Amonet al.(DES), Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmology from cosmic shear and robustness to data calibration, Phys

    A. Amonet al.(DES), Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmology from cosmic shear and robustness to data calibration, Phys. Rev. D105, 023514 (2022), 2105.13543

    arXiv 2022

  37. [37]

    L. F. Seccoet al.(DES), Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmology from cosmic shear and robustness to modeling uncertainty, Phys. Rev. D105, 023515 (2022), 2105.13544

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  38. [38]

    T. M. C. Abbottet al.(DES), Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy cluster- ing and weak lensing, Phys. Rev. D105, 023520 (2022), 2105.13549

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  39. [39]

    Dalalet al., Hyper Suprime-Cam Year 3 results: Cos- mology from cosmic shear power spectra, Phys

    R. Dalalet al., Hyper Suprime-Cam Year 3 results: Cos- mology from cosmic shear power spectra, Phys. Rev. D 108, 123519 (2023), 2304.00701

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  40. [40]

    T. M. C. Abbottet al.(Kilo-Degree Survey, DES), DES Y3 + KiDS-1000: Consistent cosmology combining cos- mic shear surveys, Open J. Astrophys.6, 2305.17173 (2023), 2305.17173

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  41. [41]

    Chenet al., Analysis of DESI×DES using the La- grangian effective theory of LSS, Phys

    S. Chenet al., Analysis of DESI×DES using the La- grangian effective theory of LSS, Phys. Rev. D110, 103518 (2024), 2407.04795

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  42. [42]

    A. H. Wrightet al., KiDS-Legacy: Cosmological con- straints from cosmic shear with the complete Kilo- Degree Survey, Astron. Astrophys.703, A158 (2025), 2503.19441

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    T. M. C. Abbottet al.(DES), Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clus- tering and Weak Lensing (2026), 2601.14559

    arXiv 2026

  44. [44]

    Garcia-Arroyo, L

    G. Garcia-Arroyo, L. A. Ure˜ na-L´ opez, and J. A. V´ azquez, Interacting scalar fields: Dark matter and early dark energy, Phys. Rev. D110, 023529 (2024), 2402.08815

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  45. [45]

    Karwal and M

    T. Karwal and M. Kamionkowski, Dark energy at early times, the Hubble parameter, and the string axiverse, Phys. Rev. D94, 103523 (2016), 1608.01309

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  46. [46]

    Poulin, T

    V. Poulin, T. L. Smith, T. Karwal, and M. Kamionkowski, Early Dark Energy Can Re- solve The Hubble Tension, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 221301 (2019), 1811.04083

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  47. [47]

    T. L. Smith, V. Poulin, and M. A. Amin, Oscillat- ing scalar fields and the Hubble tension: a resolution with novel signatures, Phys. Rev. D101, 063523 (2020), 1908.06995

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  48. [48]

    Sakstein and M

    J. Sakstein and M. Trodden, Early Dark Energy from Massive Neutrinos as a Natural Resolution of the Hub- ble Tension, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 161301 (2020), 1911.11760

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  49. [49]

    J. C. Hill, E. McDonough, M. W. Toomey, and S. Alexander, Early dark energy does not restore cosmo- logical concordance, Phys. Rev. D102, 043507 (2020), 2003.07355

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  50. [50]

    M. M. Ivanov, E. McDonough, J. C. Hill, M. Simonovi´ c, M. W. Toomey, S. Alexander, and M. Zaldarriaga, Con- straining Early Dark Energy with Large-Scale Struc- ture, Phys. Rev. D102, 103502 (2020), 2006.11235

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  51. [51]

    Kamionkowski and A

    M. Kamionkowski and A. G. Riess, The Hubble Tension and Early Dark Energy, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.73, 153 (2023), 2211.04492

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  52. [52]

    Poulin, T

    V. Poulin, T. L. Smith, and T. Karwal, The Ups and Downs of Early Dark Energy solutions to the Hubble tension: A review of models, hints and constraints circa 2023, Phys. Dark Univ.42, 101348 (2023), 2302.09032

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  53. [53]

    Niedermann and M

    F. Niedermann and M. S. Sloth, New early dark energy, Phys. Rev. D103, L041303 (2021), 1910.10739

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  54. [54]

    Niedermann and M

    F. Niedermann and M. S. Sloth, Resolving the Hubble tension with new early dark energy, Phys. Rev. D102, 063527 (2020), 2006.06686

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  55. [55]

    Smith, P

    A. Smith, P. Brax, C. van de Bruck, C. P. Burgess, and A.-C. Davis, Screened axio-dilaton cosmology: novel forms of early dark energy, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 1062 24 (2025), 2505.05450

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    Poulin, T

    V. Poulin, T. L. Smith, R. Calder´ on, and T. Simon, Impact of ACT DR6 and DESI DR2 for Early Dark Energy and the Hubble tension (2025), 2505.08051

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    A. R. Khalifeet al.(SPT-3G), SPT-3G D1: Axion Early Dark Energy with CMB experiments and DESI (2025), 2507.23355

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  58. [58]

    Kumar and R

    S. Kumar and R. C. Nunes, Echo of interactions in the dark sector, Phys. Rev. D96, 103511 (2017), 1702.02143

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  59. [59]

    Di Valentino, A

    E. Di Valentino, A. Melchiorri, and O. Mena, Can in- teracting dark energy solve theH 0 tension?, Phys. Rev. D96, 043503 (2017), 1704.08342

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  60. [60]

    W. Yang, S. Pan, E. Di Valentino, R. C. Nunes, S. Vagnozzi, and D. F. Mota, Tale of stable interact- ing dark energy, observational signatures, and theH 0 tension, JCAP09, 019, 1805.08252

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  61. [61]

    W. Yang, A. Mukherjee, E. Di Valentino, and S. Pan, Interacting dark energy with time varying equation of state and theH 0 tension, Phys. Rev. D98, 123527 (2018), 1809.06883

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  62. [62]

    S. Pan, W. Yang, E. Di Valentino, E. N. Saridakis, and S. Chakraborty, Interacting scenarios with dynamical dark energy: Observational constraints and alleviation of theH 0 tension, Phys. Rev. D100, 103520 (2019), 1907.07540

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  63. [63]

    Kumar, R

    S. Kumar, R. C. Nunes, and S. K. Yadav, Dark sector interaction: a remedy of the tensions between CMB and LSS data, Eur. Phys. J. C79, 576 (2019), 1903.04865

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  64. [64]

    Di Valentino, A

    E. Di Valentino, A. Melchiorri, O. Mena, and S. Vagnozzi, Nonminimal dark sector physics and cos- mological tensions, Phys. Rev. D101, 063502 (2020), 1910.09853

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  65. [65]

    Di Valentino, A

    E. Di Valentino, A. Melchiorri, O. Mena, and S. Vagnozzi, Interacting dark energy in the early 2020s: A promising solution to theH 0 and cosmic shear ten- sions, Phys. Dark Univ.30, 100666 (2020), 1908.04281

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  66. [66]

    G´ omez-Valent, V

    A. G´ omez-Valent, V. Pettorino, and L. Amendola, Up- date on coupled dark energy and theH 0 tension, Phys. Rev. D101, 123513 (2020), 2004.00610

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  67. [67]

    Lucca and D

    M. Lucca and D. C. Hooper, Shedding light on dark matter-dark energy interactions, Phys. Rev. D102, 123502 (2020), 2002.06127

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  68. [68]

    S. Pan, G. S. Sharov, and W. Yang, Field theoretic in- terpretations of interacting dark energy scenarios and recent observations, Phys. Rev. D101, 103533 (2020), 2001.03120

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  69. [69]

    Gao, Z.-W

    L.-Y. Gao, Z.-W. Zhao, S.-S. Xue, and X. Zhang, Reliev- ing the H 0 tension with a new interacting dark energy model, JCAP07, 005, 2101.10714

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  70. [70]

    Kumar, Remedy of some cosmological tensions via ef- fective phantom-like behavior of interacting vacuum en- ergy, Phys

    S. Kumar, Remedy of some cosmological tensions via ef- fective phantom-like behavior of interacting vacuum en- ergy, Phys. Dark Univ.33, 100862 (2021), 2102.12902

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  71. [71]

    W. Yang, S. Pan, E. Di Valentino, O. Mena, and A. Mel- chiorri, 2021-H0 odyssey: closed, phantom and interact- ing dark energy cosmologies, JCAP10, 008, 2101.03129

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  72. [72]

    R. C. Nunes, S. Vagnozzi, S. Kumar, E. Di Valentino, and O. Mena, New tests of dark sector interactions from the full-shape galaxy power spectrum, Phys. Rev. D 105, 123506 (2022), 2203.08093

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  73. [73]

    Bernui, E

    A. Bernui, E. Di Valentino, W. Giar` e, S. Kumar, and R. C. Nunes, Exploring the H0 tension and the evidence for dark sector interactions from 2D BAO measure- ments, Phys. Rev. D107, 103531 (2023), 2301.06097

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  74. [74]

    L. A. Escamilla, O. Akarsu, E. Di Valentino, and J. A. Vazquez, Model-independent reconstruction of the in- teracting dark energy kernel: Binned and Gaussian pro- cess, JCAP11, 051, 2305.16290

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  75. [75]

    Giar` e, M

    W. Giar` e, M. A. Sabogal, R. C. Nunes, and E. Di Valentino, Interacting Dark Energy after DESI Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 251003 (2024), 2404.15232

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  76. [76]

    Li, P.-J

    T.-N. Li, P.-J. Wu, G.-H. Du, S.-J. Jin, H.-L. Li, J.-F. Zhang, and X. Zhang, Constraints on Interacting Dark Energy Models from the DESI Baryon Acoustic Oscil- lation and DES Supernovae Data, Astrophys. J.976, 1 (2024), 2407.14934

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  77. [77]

    Li, G.-H

    T.-N. Li, G.-H. Du, Y.-H. Li, P.-J. Wu, S.-J. Jin, J.- F. Zhang, and X. Zhang, Probing the sign-changeable interaction between dark energy and dark matter with DESI baryon acoustic oscillations and DES supernovae data, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.69, 210413 (2026), 2501.07361

    arXiv 2026

  78. [78]

    M. A. Sabogal, E. Silva, R. C. Nunes, S. Kumar, and E. Di Valentino, Sign switching in dark sector coupling interactions as a candidate for resolving cosmological tensions, Phys. Rev. D111, 043531 (2025), 2501.10323

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  79. [79]

    Silva, M

    E. Silva, M. A. Sabogal, M. Scherer, R. C. Nunes, E. Di Valentino, and S. Kumar, New constraints on in- teracting dark energy from DESI DR2 BAO observa- tions, Phys. Rev. D111, 123511 (2025), 2503.23225

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  80. [80]

    W. Yang, S. Zhang, O. Mena, S. Pan, and E. Di Valentino, Dark Energy Is Not That Into You: Variable Couplings after DESI DR2 BAO (2025), 2508.19109

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

Showing first 80 references.