REVIEW 5 cited by
DNA-GPT: Divergent N-Gram Analysis for Training-Free Detection of GPT-Generated Text
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have notably enhanced the fluency and diversity of machine-generated text. However, this progress also presents a significant challenge in detecting the origin of a given text, and current research on detection methods lags behind the rapid evolution of LLMs. Conventional training-based methods have limitations in flexibility, particularly when adapting to new domains, and they often lack explanatory power. To address this gap, we propose a novel training-free detection strategy called Divergent N-Gram Analysis (DNA-GPT). Given a text, we first truncate it in the middle and then use only the preceding portion as input to the LLMs to regenerate the new remaining parts. By analyzing the differences between the original and new remaining parts through N-gram analysis in black-box or probability divergence in white-box, we unveil significant discrepancies between the distribution of machine-generated text and the distribution of human-written text. We conducted extensive experiments on the most advanced LLMs from OpenAI, including text-davinci-003, GPT-3.5-turbo, and GPT-4, as well as open-source models such as GPT-NeoX-20B and LLaMa-13B. Results show that our zero-shot approach exhibits state-of-the-art performance in distinguishing between human and GPT-generated text on four English and one German dataset, outperforming OpenAI's own classifier, which is trained on millions of text. Additionally, our methods provide reasonable explanations and evidence to support our claim, which is a unique feature of explainable detection. Our method is also robust under the revised text attack and can additionally solve model sourcing. Codes are available at https://github.com/Xianjun-Yang/DNA-GPT.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Subliminal Learning: Language models transmit behavioral traits via hidden signals in data
Teacher language models transfer behavioral traits to students fine-tuned on semantically unrelated number, code, and reasoning traces, especially when the two models share initialization.
-
Black-Box Detection of LLM-Generated Text Using Generalized Jensen-Shannon Divergence
SurpMark detects machine-generated text by estimating state-transition matrices from discretized surprisals and scoring them with generalized Jensen-Shannon divergence to human versus machine references.
-
Beyond Easy Wins: A Text Hardness-Aware Benchmark for LLM-generated Text Detection
SHIELD shows that standard AUROC overstates AI-text detector quality, and that six zero-shot detectors collapse under a controllable word-replacement humanification.
-
Detecting LLM-generated Code with Subtle Modification by Adversarial Training
CodeGPTSensor+, trained with adversarial samples that combine identifier renaming and structure transformation, is substantially more robust to subtle modifications of LLM-generated code than the original CodeGPTSensor.
-
Traceable TTS: Toward Watermark-Free TTS with Strong Traceability
A joint training loop makes an F5-TTS model produce audio that a paired wav2vec 2.0/LCNN discriminator can recognize, enabling watermark-free attribution; however, the reported generalization gain is not isolated from...
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.